
The Mount Roman villa, Maidstone
Contributions to the next volume are welcome. See the guidance for contributors and contact Editor Jason Mazzocchi. Also see the guidance for peer review.
Search page
Search within this page here, search the collection page or search the website.
Wricklemarsh revisited
Seasalter: A problem borough in Domesday Kent re-examined
The Mount Roman villa, Maidstone
THE MOUNT ROMAN VILLA, MAIDSTONE
D.B. KELLY
The Mount villa (N.G.R. TQ 757563) is on the east bank of the River
Medway in the north part of Maidstone, about 200 yards north-west
of Maidstone East Station (Fig. 1). The northern part, the main
subject of this report, lies within the old Cavalry Barracks, but the
greater part of the building is south of the barracks wall, covered by a
mound of earth up to 20 ft. in height on which a thicket of mature
trees grows.
The villa was built on the Weald clay, exposed by the River
Medway cutting down as a result of successive falls in sea level. 1 Its
south-west side looks across the river to what is now a semi-derelict
industrial area, but would have been a pleasing prospect of the river
and rising ground beyond, a factor in the choice of site as well as the
convenience of the river. Three hundred yards to the east the Roman
road from Rochester to the vicinity of Hastings passed the villa,2 so
that access was good both by road and river. A mile to the south
along this road was another Roman villa3 and beyond this the
ragstone quarries at Boughton Monchelsea. Upstream, about three
miles to the south-west, were two villas or farms at Barming and
another at Teston.4 Downstream there was a building, perhaps a
villa, at Allington5 and, three and a half miles distant, the great villa
at Eccles6 on the right bank and another villa at Snodland on the
left. 7
1 B.C. Worssam, Geology of the Country around Maidstone (Memoirs of the
Geological Survey of Great Britain, H.M.S.O. 1963), 24, 115.
2 I.A. Margary, Roman Ways in the Weald (3rd. edn., London, 1965), 214-6.
3 Arch. Cant., x (1876), 163-172.
4 V.C.H. Kent, iii (1932), 104, 125 and refs. therein.
5 Ibid., 103.
6 A.P. Detsicas, The Cantiaci (Gloucester, 1983), 120-6; interim reports in Arch.
Cant., lxxvii (1963) - xciii (1977), and Arch. Cant., cvii (1989), 83-8.
7 Arch. Cant., lxxxii (1967), 192-217, and forthcoming.
177
D.B. KELLY
HISTORY OF THE SITE
The Mount villa was discovered in 1843 when part of the river bank
above the tow-path collapsed, revealing masonry. The adjacent
garden to the east was excavated by C.T. Smythe in the same year,
revealing the south wing of the villa, 8 but a newly planted orchard to
the north prevented further work. This orchard was bounded on the
north by the wall of the old Cavalry Barracks, built in 1797.
Immediately inside the wall was the officers', later known as the
commandant's, garden, separated from the large Barrack Field to its
north by a hedge or row of trees. These features are shown on Daniel
Alexander's map (for the new Maidstone Gaol) of 1810, Tootell's
map of Maidstone (1848) and the 25 inch O.S. map of 1865.
With the exception of a Tudor belt or dress hook nothing was
found in the excavation, confined to the north of the barracks wall,
that dated from the centuries after the Roman period to the
seventeenth century. Immediately to the north of the barracks wall
were three pits, dateable to the second half of the seventeenth and
eighteenth centuries, used, to judge by the paucity of finds, for
night-soil. Their position suggests that the boundary marked by the
barracks wall was in existence by the seventeenth century. This
boundary falls roughly along the north wall of what is here called the
main block of the villa, although it diverges slightly to the north
(Fig. 3), and it is possible that the visible remains of the villa were
used to mark an early boundary here. The next boundary to the
north, the row of trees, also falls roughly along the line of the
buildings on the north side of the villa yard.
Maidstone East Station was opened in 1874, with the arrival of the
London, Chatham and South-East Railway, and the site of the villa
became the property of the railway company, which built sidings over
the eastern part of the garden and orchard, though not over the villa.
In 1884, the line was extended east to Ashford and the spoil from the
tunnel adjacent to the station and the cutting beyond was perhaps the
source of the mound of earth which now covers the main part of the
villa to the south of the barrack wall.
In 1970, there was a proposal to build a telephone exchange near
the site and the Maidstone Area Archaeological Group, directed by
our member A. Miles, excavated by the tow-path adjacent to the part
ofthe villa uncovered in 1843. Although the site had been disturbed
by the laying of electric cables and a water main and damaged by a
war-time bomb, the footings of the west range were found (Fig. 2), of
8 J.B.A.A., ii (1847), 86-8.
i78
(/)
ro
w
THE MOUNT ROMAN VILLA, MAIDSTONE
(/)
-"'
(.)
ro
Cl)
CJ) l C:
C:
ro
z
Cl)
179
o.i
i::
8
·a
:::E
..ci"
E
;:l
0
:::E
8
§
ffi
D.B. KELLY
coarse wares, plain samian, a single sherd of figured samian and part
of a colour-coated beaker. Only one identifiable coin was found, an
AE of Gordian III.
The plan gives the width of the walls: the outside south wall and the
internal east-west wall next to it on the north were 2 ft. (0.60 m.)
wide and all the others, including the outside wall to the east, 1 ft.
4 in. (0.40 m.). The footings of the west range uncovered in 1970 and
1978 were wider than this and the two standing walls observed in 1978
were 0.70 m. (2 ft. 4 in.) and 0.50 m. (1 ft. 8 in.) wide.
The excavation by A. Miles in 1970 uncovered most of the west
corridor, including the part of its east wall found in 1843. The site,
next to the tow-path, had been disturbed by electricity cables, the
water main and a war-time bomb, which had removed a section of the
east wall. The east wall of the corridor was traced almost to the
barracks wall, but disturbance had removed even the footings of the
west wall for about 20 ft. south of the barracks wall. No trace was
found of the buttresses shown on the 1843 plan and the south-west
corner had completely disappeared. The east and north walls of room
J, in the south-west corner, met the other walls as butt joints, but as
these were footings they cannot necessarily be regarded as later
additions. No stratified finds were found.
The construction of a main sewer in 1978 necessitated the cutting
back of a small part of the mound covering the main building in the
area immediately south of the barracks wall next to the tow-path. The
west range was here again reduced to footings, but a few stretches
additional to those found in 1970 were uncovered and also a longer
stretch of the narrow wall running east from it. To the north of this
wall, the south wall of room L, another wall was uncovered, crossing
the west range and continuing eastward. Where, as the south wall of
room M, it joined the east wall of the west corridor, the footings, to
about a foot in height, were butted against those of the north-south
wall, but at the highest surviving level both walls were of one build.
Presumably this was done for convenience in setting out the foundations
and suggests that butt joints at the lowest level do not in
themselves prove more than one building phase.
This wall (Fig. 4, A-B) was 0.70 m. (2 ft. 4 in.) wide, of roughly
coursed ragstone with yellow mortar, the bottom course of the
footing set in clay. It was built at almost the same width as the
footings. The part covered by the mound stood, measuring from the
bottom of the footings, to a height of 1.80 m. (6 ft.). On the south, in
room L, the layer above the natural clay was of a dirty brown clay,
containing a few tiny fragments of unidentifiable pottery, and capped
with ragstone cobbling. Above this was a second brown clay layer.
These may be the make-up layers of successive floors, though the
186
THE MOUNT ROMAN VILLA, MAIDSTONE
limited area of the cut precludes any certainty. In the north-east angle
of room/corridor K, in a layer of yellow mortar above the natural
clay, taken to be a construction layer, were found sherds from five
pots, the only dating evidence for phase 1, or, indeed, any other
phase, found in the main building. One of these pots, a grooved dog
dish in a north Kent sandy reduced fabric (Fig. 13, 1) is dateable at
the earliest to about A.D. 130/140 and lasted well into the third
century.13 The others include storage jars of grogged ware and of
Patch Grove ware with a double line of finger-tip decoration on the
belly, a type lasting from the late first until the early third century. 14
In 1976, in the course of the excavation within the barracks, a large
buttress was found at the south-east corner of the site, aligned
north-south and continuing under the barracks wall (Fig. 3).
Immediately to its west and adjacent to the phase 2 return wall,
running west from the south end of the east wall of the yard, the edge
of a wall running east-west projected from under the barracks wall
and this is taken to be the north wall of the main building. East of the
buttress was a substantial piece of masonry aligned east-west and
mostly destroyed by a seventeenth-century pit, which had been cut
through a thick mortary layer surrounding the masonry. Another
seventeenth-century pit was found to the east of this, but further
trenching along the line of the barracks wall revealed no more
walling. The masonry is probably a second buttress and with the first
buttress found marks the north-east corner of the main building,
corresponding to the buttresses of the south-east corner.
The presumed line of the north wall of the main building is shown
on the plan (Fig. 2) by a broken line. This wall and the two east-west
walls observed in 1978 correspond to the east-west walls of the south
range - outer wall, wide inner wall, narrow inner wall- and suggest at
least a degree of symmetry in the building, ranges of rooms surrounding
an inner courtyard. No hypocaust was found in 1843, but two in
the modern excavations (rooms 2 and 5). Unless there was a separate
and so far undiscovered bath building or bath rooms in the unexcavated
north or east range, the baths are likely to have occupied the
north-west corner of the villa, now almost completely removed, and
included the rooms (1-5), now inside the barracks wall, of phases 1
and 3. This quarter is nearest to the river and, given the natural slope
of the clay towards the river, would necessitate less work in preparing
the ground for hypocaust rooms and furnace. Moreover, its walls -
13 J. Monaghan, Upchurch and Thameside Roman Pottery, B.A.R. Brit. series 173
(1987), 150. (Hereafter Monaghan 1987). Type 5Fl.
14 R.J. Pollard, The Roman Pottery of Kent (Maidstone, 1988), fig. 13, 21.
(Hereafter Pollard 1988).
187
D.B. KELLY
those of rooms 1-5 and the north wall of room L - are more
substantial and survive to a greater height than any others.
Like Thomas Charles, another local antiquary, the Rev. Beale
Poste, was impressed by the 'preposterous size and thickness of the
buttresses' and in his paper on Roman Maidstone in the first volume
of our journal 15 allows himself some speculation on the matter. The
reason for their building was almost certainly the unreliable nature of
the Weald clay, especially when sloping towards the river. It cannot
be shown at present whether or not these buttresses were planned
from the beginning or were a later addition. If they are not part of a
later re-building the predominance of the narrower gauge walls found
in 1843, including the stretch of the external wall on the east side,
may be due to the need to reduce the weight of the building and the
buttresses may have been added after only some walls had been built
at the greater width at the start of the construction. In two instances,
at least, the footings of the narrow gauge walls - those between
rooms E and H and the south wall of room L - were laid at the same
time as those of the east wall of the west corridor.
The 1843 plan shows that part of the villa in its final stage and
without distinction of building phases. Although some of the narrow
gauge walls were present from the start, the herring-bone masonry of
some internal walls, not found elsewhere on the site, may indicate a
partial rebuild or internal re-arrangement of rooms, as do the
possible successive floor layers of room L. The 1970 excavation by
A. Miles showed that the north and east walls of room J butted
against the others, so this may be a later division, though these walls
survived only as footings and are thus not necessarily later than phase
1. If rooms 1-4 in the north part of the building are taken as part of
the original build, then the limited dating evidence from them for
phase 1 is consistent with that from room K and points to a first
building phase in the second half of the second century. The rarity of
pottery dateable before the middle of the second century is remarked
below.
THE NORTHERN AREA
Phase 1
The earliest building in the northern part of the villa is a range of four
rooms (1-4) running north-south, roughly parallel with the river
(Fig. 3). A modern water main had been laid in the natural clay
15 Arch. Cant., i (1858), 171-2.
188
THE MOUNT ROMAN VILLA, MAIDSTONE
-----·-,,,,
,. ,l· ..
I
tu . .. r
0
·,
,_ ____ ,, • N;: =
f-------=--=-cilr,i
:::=.. .·)
·: :!:•
_::11,il'_:_---
1------tl:d'C'f"""--i
<;:
t------of
w------ --
•
_______ I
J
189
•
0
a,
I
""
i
0
"'
'£
D.B. KELLY
below the level of the villa foundations, running down the centre of
the range and thus destroying the central parts of the internal
east-west walls. The east wall of the range survived or was traceable
for its entire length, but almost two-thirds of the west wall had been
destroyed by a modern (? nineteenth century) brick terrace or
foundation, including the whole west wall of room 1. These interruptions
and the refurbishment of phase 3 had removed nearly all
internal features and with them most of the dating evidence. Room 4
had no wall on its west side and was presumably a porch.
The walls were of ragstone with a yellow mortar, very substantial
and set into the natural clay, which slopes downwards to the west and
north, at depths ranging from 0. 70 m. (2 ft. 4 in.) at the south end to
0.30 m. (1 ft.) at the north. The lowest course was unmortared and
packed with clay. At the south end of the range the east wall survived
to as much as 1.80 m. (6 ft.) from the lowest course (Fig. 5, K-L), but
was reduced to a single course at its north end, north of the line of
trees. The eastern north-south wall averaged 0. 75 m. (2 ft. 6 in.) in
width, the western, in the short remaining length uncovered, 0.90 m.
(3 ft.). The internal east-west walls were 1 m. (3 ft. 3 in.) wide. The
internal lengths of rooms 2, 3 and 4 were, respectively, 7 m. (23 ft.),
3.10 m. (10 ft. 2 in.) and 3.80 m. (12 ft. 6 in.) and the internal width of
room 3 and the north part of room 2 was 3.20 m. (10 ft. 6 in.). Room
2 was provided with a floor of white mortar, some 80 cm. (3 in.) thick,
which lay beneath the heavy rubble make-up for the phase 3
hypocaust floor, and room 3 had a clay floor. Material from the phase
2 construction layers between the east wall of rooms 2 and 3 and the
west wall of the phase 2 yard included window glass, T-shaped
clamps, box-tiles and wall-plaster, not necessarily from rooms 1-4,
but belonging to phase 1.
The only certain evidence providing a date for phase 1 comes from
a burot layer in room 3, immediately above the natural clay and
below the make-up for the phase 3 floor, and this provides a terminus
ante quern for the construction (T18/7 - Fig. 4, C-D). Among the
sherds of half-a-dozen fabrics only three forms were recognisable: a
samian Form 18/31 or Form 31 dish, a dog dish of Gillam type 328
(Fig. 13, 2) and a flange in a fine micaceous ware from what is
probably a copy of a samian Form 38 bowl. Gillam 328 can be as early
as A.D. 120-130 in the south, though lasting until the end of the
century, 16 but the samian Form 38 copy belongs to the second half of
16 G. Marsh and P. Tyers, 'The Roman Pottery from Southwark,' in Southwark
Excavations 1972-1974 (Joint Publication No. 1 of London and Middx. A.S. and
Surrey A.S., 1978), 533 ff; their type IV.J.2.
190
THE MOUNT ROMAN VILLA, MAIDSTONE
-- ------------
t--=---=---=---=---=---=---=---=---=--= H
.
u
►
z
...
I
S:
-,
I
191
I-"
tS
I
j It>
(:, ;-:·,:,l•
1 Not
f e,c:eav.eted
Buttress pl
,.
.t>
J