( 68 )
CANTERBURY EXCAVATIONS LN 1945.
BY AUDBEY WILLIAMS, E.S.A.
I. A SITE IN BUBGATE STBEBT.
IN 1868 a mosaic (now in the Royal Museum, Canterbury) was found
at a depth of eight feet below the carriage-way of Burgate Street,
about eighteen yards west of Iron Bar Lane. In 1871 more of the
^ _
B.M.47-2
*o APPROXIMATE
N SITES OF
EARLIER *r EXCAVATIONS
S
J> *e * *r
s
EXCAVATED AREAS BLACK
GROUND FLOOR STIPPLED
FEET 100 200
- I 1 1
PIG. 1. BUEGATE STBEET SITE.
buUding to which this pavement belonged was discovered beneath
the adjacent south pavement, and in a yard adjoining, where there
appeared " a waU of sohd concrete " and a second mosaic. Other
walls and floors were said to he nearby.1 With these facts in mind the
Canterbury Excavation Committee selected as its second site for
excavation three ceUars on the south side of Burgate Street with a
frontage twenty to forty-five yards west of Iron Bar Lane (Fig. 1, 1-3)-
1 V.O.H., Kent, p. 72, tabulating Phlbrow's notes.
CANTERBURY EXCAVATIONS JANUARY AND APRIL 1945
MODERN WALL BURGATE STREET
.37-30
PARTLY EXCAVATED I FLOOR,
(PERIOD II) PH5 8,6 y-2'10")
X'38-42 ~ PH7(+2'5")
CELLAR
NATURAL) CELLAR
MEDIEVAL PIT CELLAR
44-95
^ S ^
44-76
3
FEET
ROMAN
W> FOUNDATIONS
m WALL 1
'//, FOUNDATIONS]
Hill FOUNDATIONS PERIOD H
P i - 4 PITS
PH1-7 POSTHOLES
PERIOD I
•PERIOD I
(+11") HEIGHT OF THE TOP OF
ETC A FEATURE ABOVE
NATURAL SOIL. OTHER
MEDIEVAL FEATURES RUN UP TO
SOS WALL THE CELLAR FLOORS _
38.96 LEVELS IN FEET ABOVE
ETC O.D.
Eio. 2. BURGATE STREET SITE : PLAN.
CANTEBBUBY EXCAVATIONS IN 1945 69
Here part of a buUding of some size was uncovered and dating evidence,
tantahziagly absent from earher records of Roman Canterbury, secured
from weh-stratified deposits.
Although the results are here coordinated the actual work was
carried out in two stages. In January 1945 two exploratory trenches
were dug, one roughly north-south in ceUar 1 (Fig. 2, AA') and the
second east-west in ceUar 2 (Fig. 2, DD'). Concrete foundations of
Roman date having appeared at the north and south ends of the first
cutting, April 1945 was devoted to foUowing up this clue. The inner
face of the concrete, indicating the north, west, and south walls of a
buUding, was traced in ceUar 1. The north-west outer face was
found in ceUar 2 and the north-east external angle in ceUar 3 (Fig. 2,
CC). The total width of the foundation was accessible in an entrance
through the exceptionaUy wide party-waU between ceUars 1 and 3
and the outer face of the concrete could be foUowed from this point
almost to its return to the south.
A cutting was taken at the south-west corner of ceUar 1 through the
ground floor area to the west (Fig. 2, EE'). The later Roman levels,
the primary objective of this section, had been destroyed and the whole
of the make-up was of medieval date. It was, however, gratifying
to find that part of the waU buUt on the concrete foundation had here
survived, incorporated in a later party waU! Further search for
Roman levels later than those encountered in the ceUar was made
south of ceUar 1. It was hoped to get a more or less continuous section
across this open ground floor level but the two trenches dug showed
intensive use of the area in comparatively recent times. In each case
the cutting was taken out to slightly below the level of the ceUar floor
but vaults, later in-fiUed and bricked up, cess-pits and rubbish pits
had destroyed the deshed evidence.
A smaU trial trench in a ceUar on the north side of Burgate Street
(Fig. 1, 4) showed stratification simUar to that of cutting A in ceUar
1 but was featureless.
SECTION A (FIG. 3).
Virgin soU, a yeUow clayey loam, occurred at 6-8 feet below the
modern floor, at about 30 feet above O.D. The fact that natural
ground here was low compared with other parts of the Roman town1
explains the necessity for the succession of build-up deposits found
throughout the site. They were evidently intended to combat marshy
conditions. The various layers are referred to below by the numbers
given them in the drawn section, Fig. 3, AA'.
The earhest feature was a small guUy dug in natural soil (PI. I, 1).
I t had short sloping sides and a wide flat bottom. Its width was
1 44 feet O.D. in tbe Burgate Lane area. Arch. Oant., Vol. LIX, p. 69 and
Boman Canterbury, No. 2, p. 7.
70 CANTEEBUEY EXCAVATIONS IN 1945
2 feet 6 inches and its normal depth 7 inches, though to the west (in
cutting C) it deepened to 10 inches to give a shght faU to a sump 20
inches deep. Its further course, if any, lay outside the excavated
area. The guUy probably served as a drain for surface water.
Evidently it had been in use when the first deposit of heavy grey loam
(1) was laid down. In section it showed no sUting ; its filling consisted
entirely of the grey loam. The two sherds found in it, a scrap of
Belgic combed ware and a fragment of wheel-made fine black ware,
belong to the grey deposit and not to what must have been part of the
earhest occupation of this area. The grey loam, a foot (more or less)
thick, contained Claudian Samian and early types of coarse ware.
Above came an occupation level (2). Black soil, rich in potsherds,
broken animal bones, oyster sheUs, crushed charcoal and scraps of daub,
ran the whole length of the cutting and was found again to the west
in cutting C. Associated with this occupation in cutting A were
three stake-holes, aU dug in the grey loam. FUled with black soil
they were uniformly chcular, 5 inches across, 7 inches deep and bluntlypointed
in section. One of them, as PI. I, 1 shows, had flints ringed
round its mouth. The holes must have held the timber supports of
a wattle-and-daub structure, either the waU of a hut or of a fence.
The level is dated to the middle of the first century by Claudian Samian
and a coin of Claudius I of A.D. 41 lost whUe in good condition.
Part of this occupation layer was sealed by a deposit of yeUow
loam (3), clean enough to have been taken from virgin soil elsewhere,
and, in fact, at first regarded as undisturbed. It did not, however,
run the whole length of the cutting and appeared to have been laid
down to level up the subsidence in the preceding deposit over the
guUy area. It produced only three fragments of pottery, aU Samian
of Claudian date.
The next deposit, of gravel (4), was thinly spread over the yeUow
loam, more thickly (but stiU only 8 inches thick) over the unsealed
occupation layer to the south. It produced no datable material.
Above came more yeUow loam (5). This contained lumps of flint
and chalk and, for about half the length of the cutting, a thin, grey,
somewhat sticky band taken to represent decayed turves.1 The
pottery from this second yeUow loam included Flavian Samian.
Succeeding the late first century deposit was another thin layer
of clean gravel (6), which could not be dated from a solitary smaU
pot. In cutting 0, however, the same gravel produced a sherd of
Trajanic Samian as did black soil at the same level at the west end
of that trench.
It foUows that the next deposit (7) in cutting A, though it contained
Flavian Samian and no closely datable coarse ware, cannot be earher
1 Similar bands frequently occur where turves have been used in barrowbuilding.
HEARTH MODERN BUILD-UP
/ 7 / S ^ E ^ S ; TTTZMZZZZZZZZte.-
MID -2ND
CENTURY v x
n CULLY
^(PROJECTED) PH3 N I X v ^ - • - . s x ^ ^
MODERN BUILD-UP
TTTHXI
BRICKS
ft
PIT 2 ^
CENTURY-J
MODERN BUILD-UP
LATE 2ND
CENTURY.
X-WALL
MEDIEVAL
PIT
MODERN
DIEVAL FACING
EPOS1TS
MODERN
TRENCH
MODERN BUILD-UPj,
M0DERN
TRENCH
'7S^U^4£ZL:
K ^ ^ ^ S ^ N S
(PROJECTED) PH 4 W
I I I I I
MODERN BUILD-UP
MODERN
TRENCHES
I
FOUNDATIONS = ^PERIOD I '//, PERIOD H
\\GREY LOAM ^ GREY LOAM WTH FLINTS
:•:•:•:•: BLACK SOIL «K BLACK SOIL WITH SHELLS
<% RED SOIL //YELLOW LOAM
:••« GRAVEL 1.1 ! MIXED SOILS T~TNATURAL LOAM
«o
H
FIG. 3. BURGATE STREET SITE : SECTIONS.
CANTEEBTJBY EXCAVATIONS IN 1945 71
than the early 2nd century. This black sheUy soU ran for most part
thinly over the gravel, but at the north end of the cutting it had patches
of yeUow loam either beneath or mixed with it.
In the deposit (8) immediately beneath the make-up for the ceUar
floor various materials mingled; yeUow and grey loam, reddened
soil, black soU and, to the south, a few bricks formed a confused mass.
Towards the north end of the trench a hoUowed area had been used
as a hearth, now visible as red soU, cracked stones and a quantity of
black ash. Nothing datable came from the hearth, but it was obviously
later, however shghtly, than layer 8 which was dated by pottery and,
in cutting C, by a coin to the second half of the 2nd century. From
layer 8 came part of a mortarium stamped by Juvenahs. The only
previous record of this stamp is from Boulogne.
The foundations encountered in this and other sections are
discussed later.
SECTION B (FIG. 3).
The south half of the west face of cutting A gave a section through
two later pits, one of whioh straddled the trench. On plan Pit 1 was
roughly chcular, just over 8 feet across. In profile it was bag-shaped
and 13 feet deep, running from the top of layer 8 down into natural
soil. It had been fiUed with heavy grey soU and large nodules of flint.
From it came a coin of A.D. 141 and Hadrian-Antonine pottery. The
pit must have been cut and fiUed in quite soon after layer 8 had been
deposited in the middle-late 2nd century.
In the 4th century a curious funnel-shaped pit (Pit 2) was dug in
the filling of Pit 1. Wide at the mouth (4 feet 6 inches by 5 feet) it
tapered to become a square shaft, 2 feet 2 inches across by 6 feet 3 inches
deep out of the pit's total depth of 8 feet 6 inches. Its sticky black
filling suggested a predominance of decayed vegetable matter.
SECTION C (FIG. 3).
The stratification in cutting C (ceUar 2) equated fahly closely with
that of cutting A, as the numbering of the deposits in Fig. 3 shows.
As might be expected materials varied from cutting to cutting; here
less gravel and more occupation soil were encountered. Within the
narrow hmits of the excavation it was difficult to differentiate between
occupation soil in situ and that brought from elsewhere as make-up.
Possibly some of the black soil layers may be associated with postholes
just outside the cutting, or form part of floors of which only a
narrow strip has been seen.
At a shghtly lower level than the stake-holes of cutting A, but
belonging to the same Claudian occupation, cutting C had a large posthole
surrounded by a patch of black soil (2A). The hole penetrated
the first grey loam deposit (1) to the underlying natural soil. It was
72 CANTEBBTJEY EXCAVATIONS IN 1945
16 inches in diameter and 18 inches deep. Its post, a substantial
one, seems to have been withdrawn before the floor was covered with
further grey loam, for in the filling loam occurred mixed with and
beneath black soU. Over the grey layer, at the east end of the cutting,
lay black soU which was evidently the occupation level (2) of cutting
A petering out.
In deposits 4 and 5 Flavian material began to appear. An
interesting item from the yeUow loam (5) was a mortarium, practicaUy
complete, stamped by Orbissa, a Flavian potter whose work was
hitherto known in this country only from London.
It may be that the deposits numbered 4-7 were laid down in quick
succession in that three joining pieces of a Samian bowl by the
Vespasianic potter Vitahs came from the black bands 4, 6A and 7.
On the other hand, since nothing can be known of the history of these
fragments theh presence in these layers may be mere coincidence.
More important is the fact, aheady mentioned, that layer 6 contained
an early 2nd century element; Trajanic Samian occurred in both the
gravel (6) and the black soU (6A) to the west. Associated with the
black soU of layer 7 was a mass of red soil, indicative of fires; it
extended across the cutting, was 6 feet long and 6 to 8 inches deep at
its maximum. The top layer (8) produced Hadrian-Antonine pottery,
and a sestertius of Antoninus Pius, A.D. 145-61, in good condition.
At the east end of the cutting were two rubbish pits, both obviously
later than the mid-2nd century layer. It was evident that pit 3 also
post-dated the concrete foundation. On plan it remained a half-circle,
an obviously incomplete form, against the outer face of the concrete.
In section the chronological relationship between the features was clear.
The pit ran deeper (4 feet 4 inches below the modern make-up) than
the concrete (2 feet 6 inches deep) and had it been the earher its black
tilling must have appeared beneath the concrete. In fact, the concrete
rested on normal loam, and the waU of the pit continued the vertical
line of the face of the foundation. The material from the pit is of
3rd to mid-4th century date, by which time the waU of the buUding
was presumably obhterated at this point and the pit-diggers started
work at a higher level, ignorant of the foundation below.
Pit 4 dated to the late 2nd-3rd century and was probably, as wUl
be seen, contemporary with the buUding. Bag-shaped in profile it
had the same black filling as pit 3. It was just over 9 feet deep, running
down through the grey loam and destroying the sump of the guUy dug
in the undisturbed soil.
SECTION D (FIG. 3).
In ceUar 3 the stratification was rather simpler than elsewhere but
the dating material corroborated the evidence from the previous
cuttings. Undisturbed soU lay 6 feet (more or less) below the ceUar
\ .. -^
PLATE I (1). BURGATE STREET SITE
A gully in natural soil (marked by fork) Bad a
century post-hole (left centre).
raid- 1st
PLATE I (2). BURGATE STREET SITE.
Clasping buttress at north-west corner of building.
PLATE II (1). BURGATE STREET SITE.
Late 2nd century wall in cutting E, north face.
PLATE II (2). BURGATE STREET SITE.
Late 2nd century wall in cutting E, south face.
CANTEBBUBY EXCAVATIONS IN 1945 73
floor. Over it came a thick band of yeUow-brown loam (1). Above
this the west end of the cutting had been disturbed by pipe-laying
trenches, one along the cutting, the other across it. To the east the
sequence was black sheUy soU (2), grey loam (3), more occupation
soil (4) and a top layer of mixed soils (5) familiar as layer 8 of cuttings
A and C. The earliest three layers, to a height of just under 3 feet,
can be taken as Claudian or rather later. Layer 4 had Flavian material
with Claudian survivals and the final " mixed " deposit was Antonine.
In an extension south from the west end of the cutting was found
a group of three post-holes, aU close together but one at a shghtly lower
level than the other two. AU were dug in the pre-Flavian loam and
seemed to be associated with the Flavian occupation soU (4) but it
was not possible to decide whether they belonged to a definite timber
structure. One post-hole was rectangular, 6 inches by 4 inches by
12 inches deep. The other two were round, 5 to 6 inches across and 10
inches deep. They contained scraps of carbonized wood and a couple
of Flavian potsherds.
THE BITILDING.
The concrete foundations (Fig. 2, hatched) enclosed an area 35 feet
north-south by 22 feet east-west. The top of the concrete lay normahy
about 12 inches below the ceUar floor; in some places, for instance at
the south end of cutting A, it had been cut away and a greater depth
of modern make-up covered it. The foundations were just over 3 feet
wide and had a depth of 3 feet or more. At the north corners, where
clasping buttresses (PI. I, 2) occurred, they ran down to 6 feet.
Of the south corners only that on the west could be investigated.
There, by undercutting the modern wall and also the ground floor area
south of cutting B, it was found that the foundation of a waU running
away to the south joined the outer face of the south foundation of the
excavated buUding. This second foundation was of concrete, 2 feet
6 inches wide, its outer face projecting shghtly beyond that of the waU
it joined. A gap in the main foundations suggested a doorway in the
south waU. This may have given into the room to the south. It may,
however, have been an external opening and the south room may he
west of its one known waU. In either case this second foundation
showed that the excavated building was but part of a larger structure.
On the south-west (in cutting E, described below) the outer face of
the waU itself survived above the concrete (PI. II, 1 and 2). Its inner
face had been cut back and faced with cement to form the existing
cellar wall. The outer face was uncovered for a few feet either side
of the section cutting. It may be assumed that a length of it was
preserved beneath the ground floor area south of ceUar 2. The waU
and the foundations were examined with great care for signs of later,
possibly medieval, waU-building on the earher foundation but there
74 CANTEBBDBY EXCAVATIONS IN 1945
was not the slightest line of demarcation ; the base course was firmly
bedded in the concrete and the whole structure was obviously of one
buUd. The waU face, of roughly coursed dressed flints, stood almost
5 feet high above a shghtly projecting base course. Patches of
adhering plaster indicated that the building was originaUy plastered
externaUy.
There is sufficient evidence for assigning the buUding to the late
2nd-3rd century. It must be later than the mid-2nd century deposit
into which its foundations were sunk. Also its internal partition
(see below) crossed the filling of a mid-2nd century pit (Pit 1). On the
other hand it antedated, as has been seen, a 4th century pit (Pit 3)
against the north-west buttress. In view of the general insecurity of
the 3rd century, the late 2nd century would perhaps be the more
hkely date for an urban buUding of some size. In the absence of later
Roman levels no estimate as to the length of the buUding's life can
be offered.
Turning to the interior of the buUding—clearance of the area
immediately inside the west foundation, revealed the foundations of
three cross waUs (PI. Ill, 1).
(i) The most northerly foundation was at the same level and simUar
to a slight (1 foot 6-9 inches wide and 9 inches high) foundation
found crossing cutting A. Possibly they were originaUy linked
by a return waU lying beneath the unexcavated balk. The
concrete of this cross foundation was more pebbly and darker
in colour than that found elsewhere. Although now vestigial
against the main foundation the cross waU was certainly the
earher feature. Its foundation was sunk into a late lst-early
2nd century deposit (7) and the waU itself had been razed before
the overlying mid-2nd century material (8) was laid down.
Whatever buUding it represented had been obhterated before
the main buUding was erected.
(ii) The south foundation, flints set in clay, was of later date than the
main foundation which had been cut into to accommodate its
end. It was 1 foot 10 inches wide and 2 feet deep, running right
up to the modern make-up. Little of it survived, but it may
have been a shghtly later substitute for foundation ih.
(iii) This was contemporary with the main foundation into which
it was bonded. Its waU apparently served as an internal
partition; it was just over 2 feet 6 inches wide and ran down
from the modern make-up to a depth of 2 feet.
In the north-west corner lay a rectangular patch of concrete
(PI. Ill, 2) similar to, and on the north tight against, that of the waU
foundations. It was 5 feet long (north-south) by 3 feet 6 inches wide.
Its upper surface lay 6 inches below the ceUar floor and 3 inches below
ftysvjy.'j
PLATE III (1). BURGATE STREET SITE.
The inner face of the foundations of the west wall of the
building, with foundations of three cross walls.
.irJwm*aTi *-*"''
/
h
M
MHHHHBHIHHMHHHIHHHnnHSBBBHHK:-'': V -\* T:
PLATE III (2). BURGATE STREET SITE.
Concrete floor, with medieval wall over, in north-west corner
of building.
PLATE IV. BURGATE STREET SITE.
Decorated Samian ware.
CANTEBBUBY EXCAVATIONS IN 1945 75
the top of the waU foundations. It appeared to be the foundation
of the floor of the buUding. It was mutilated on the east by a trench
for modern pipe-laying and had also been cut back on the south. Over
it ran the base course of a narrow waU, of medieval date in that two
scraps of glazed ware were incorporated in its mortar.
SECTION E (FIG. 3).
That part of cutting E which lay outside the face of the Roman
waU (Fig. 2) faUed to reward the search for later Roman levels than
could be expected to survive in the ceUars. The make-up from the
base of the outer face of the Roman waU to within 2 feet of the existing
ground floor was of medieval date. There were six distinct layers ;
yeUow clay occurred three times, black sheUy soU twice, with grey
clay as the final deposit. These layers seemed to be banked up against
the Roman waU to counteract its tendency to coUapse outwards. Its
threatening bulge was more pronounced south of cutting E. A smaU
quantity of pottery from these tips indicates a late 13th century date
for the shoring-up. It was noted that the lines of the lower tips were
stiU sagging fahly strongly at the bottom of the excavated trench,
over a foot below the base of the waU, and an underlying earher pit
may be suspected. Further west there was a later medieval pit
starting immediately beneath the modern make-up and fiUed almost
enthely with flints and large lumps of chalk. This could not be dated ;
its most determinate sherd was of 3rd century Samian ware.
SUMMABY.
To sum up : the site bespeaks continuous activity from the middle
of the 1st century to the end of the 2nd ; with sporadic use of the area
as a rubbish dump in the 3rd-4th centuries. The significance of the
guUy dug in the undisturbed surface cannot be stressed since that level
could not be sufficiently explored for post-holes and habitation soil.
It seems however, to hint at pre-Roman occupation. There were
signs of more than one timber structure in the 1st century. The
first stone building, of which only a sbght trace survived, was put
up in the early-middle 2nd century and was apparently fahly quickly
demohshed. The late 2nd century saw the erection of what may have
been some kind of public building of which part only has been
excavated. It was however, clear that its northern hmit lay beneath
what is now the south edge of Burgate Street, that its one room, with
internal partition and south doorway, occupied roughly the area now
enclosed in ceUar 1, and that a second room lay to the south. The
building evidently stood free of its neighbours ; it was unconnected"
with PiUbrow's buUding on the east and had an open space to the
west.
76 CANTEBBUBY EXCAVATIONS IN 1945
THE FINDS.
A. ROMAN.
As has been shown, the deposits, despite shght variations from
section to section, faU into three successive chronological groups. It
seems advisable to catalogue the finds according to this sequence
rather than typologicaUy. They are, therefore, grouped as mid-lst
century, late lst-2nd century and mid-2nd century. The find-spots
are indicated by the letters and numbers given to the cuttings and
deposits in the section drawings (Fig. 3). The material from the pits
is hsted separately.
The foUowing abbreviations are used :
Behn Romische Keramik mit Einschluss der hellenistichen
Vorstufen 1910.
Birdoswald Cumberland and Westmoreland Antiquarian and Archceological
Society. Transactions XXX—New Series.
C.I.L. Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum.
Haltern Loeschcke, Mitteilungen der Altertums-Kommission fur
WestfaUn V.
Hofheim Ritterling, Nassauische Annalen XL.
Knorr 1919 Knorr, Tbpfer und Frabrilcen verzierter Terra-Sigillata
des ersten Jahrhunderts, 1919.
M. 'and S. Mattingley and Sydenham, Roman Imperial Coinage.
0. Oswald, Index of Figure Types on Terra Sigillata.
0. and P. Oswald and Pryce, An Introduction to the Study of
Terra Sigillata.
Richborough Bushe-Fox, Society of Antiquaries Research Reports
I, II, HI VI, VII and X.
Verukmium Wheeler, Society of Antiquaries Research Report XI.
Wroxeter Bushe-Fox, Society of Antiquaries Research Report I.
1. FROM THE MID-1ST CENTUBY DEPOSITS.
(a) Coin. Claudius I. As of A.D. 41; worn condition. M. and
S.66. A2.
(b) Samian.
(i) Decorated.
1. Form 29 ; lower frieze. The leaf-wreath has seven bifurcated
stalks as used by COTOVS. Cf. 29, OF COTOI, Worms (Knorr 1919,
85C).Claudian. Al.
2. Form 20; lower frieze. Scale ornament and leaveB as used
by AQVITANVS. Cf. 29, AQVITANVS, Nymegen (Knorr 1919,
'8A). Claudian. Al.
3. Form 29. By SENECIO of La Graufesenque. For his vineleaf,
grapes and bird see 0. 2260A. Claudian ; A.D. 40-50. DI.
CANTEEBUBY EXCAVATIONS IN 1945 77
4. Form 29, with high glaze and large beads. The double ring
under the spirals of the medallion is characteristic of MASCLVS.
Cf. 29, OF MASCLI, Vienne (St. Germain Museum). Claudian. A2.
5. Form 30, fragments from rim and body. Style of MASCLVS.
Claudian.
(ii) Plain.
1. Form 24. cf 0. and P. XL, 10, COTTV, Aishngen. Claudian.
A2. (Fig. 4, 1.)
2. Form 24, base. Stamped OF PRIMI. Cf. 0. and P. XL, 3,
Hofheim. Claudian. A2. (Fig. 4, 2.)
n—pg3W
GMMJSEDi
C£MAs£U>4
IVtRECV
E5HD8
"irnBEHUfaiWr"
0S5KE6
FIG. 4. BURGATE STREET SITE.
Samian ware. Nos. 1, 5 and 13 (J) ; potters' stamps (f).
3. Form 18, with high glaze. Stamped TERTIVS-F as at
Hofheim. Claudian. D2. (Fig. 4, 3.)
4. Form 29, base. Stamped OF MASCLI. By Masclus of La
Graufesenque. Claudian; A.D. 45-50. D3. (Fig. 4, 4.)
Among 19 additional fragments the foUowing forms occur :
29, 24 (larger than Fig. 4, 1), 15, 15/17 (smaU), 17 (Tiberius-
Claudian), 18, and Ritt. 12.
(o) Coarse Ware (Fig. 5, 1-17). Belgic types with cordoned necks
and combed decoration were strong in this series and persisted, but
more weakly, in the later deposits. Indeterminate fragments of this
ware occurred in quantity.
1. Storage jar, recurved rim, shght offset at base of neck ; coarse
buff ware, combed decoration. Belgic. Cf. Richborough I, 29 ; midlst
century. A2.
78 OANTEBBUBY EXCAVATIONS IN 1945
s
7
EIG. 6. BURGATE STREET SITE.
Coarse ware from the mid-lst century deposits (J).
OANTEBBUBY EXCAVATIONS IN 1945 79
2. Rim of smaU jar; high round shoulder, short neck, simple
rim; coarse black ware, combed decoration. Belgic. Gi.Richboroughl,
21; mid-lst century. A2.
3. Rim of storage jar, shghtly concave body, simple flat-topped
rim thickened internaUy; grey ware, deep combed decoration.
Belgic. 01.
4. Storage jar, everted rim with squarish section, shaUow cordon
on neck ; coarse buff ware, decorated obhque combing. Belgic. C3.
5. Storage jar, everted rim, cordoned neck ; pohshed black ware,
combed on body. Belgic. C3.
6. Jar, outbent rim, cordoned at base of neck ; burnished black
ware. Belgic. A2.
7. Jar, outbent rim, cordoned neck; coarse grey-black ware.
Cf. Richborough III, 252-3, with pre-Flavian and Flavian pottery. A2.
8. Jug-neck, flanged rim, neck tapering shghtly downwards ; strap
handle; pohshed reddish ware. There is no close paraUel for the
smooth sweep of the coUar to the neck but for the general type cf.
Haltern, Taf. XII, 47. Early 1st century. A2.
9. Jug-neck with disc rim ; cream ware. Cf. Richborough III,
191 ; A.D. 50-70. A2.
10. Jug-neck with double coUar, underside of lower coUar stepped ;
cream ware. Cf. Richborough I, 66 ; early 1st century type. D2.
11. ShaUow dish with moulding at base of waU internaUy;
pohshed black ware. In imitation of Samian form 15, resembling a
weU-known Belgic platter of Arretine origin. Cf. Richborough I,
58 ; probably mid-lst century. A2.
12. Dish with simple rim and footring ; smooth buff-black ware.
D3.
13. Bowl, straight coUar; smooth black ware. Probably a
simplified version of an Arretine form cf. Haltern, Taf. X, 8, A.D.
11-16 and Verulamium, Fig. 11, 1-2, first half of 1st century A.D. A2.
14. SmaU bowl, reeded flat-topped rim; coarse grey-black ware.
Al.
15. Cooking-pot, flanged rim, girth grooves ; sandy grey-black
ware. DI.
16. 011a, undifferentiated form; buff-black ware. Al.
17. Mortarium, bead and roU rim; cream ware. DI.
II. FROM THE LATE IST-EARLY 2ND CENTURY DEPOSITS.
(a) Samian.
(i) Decorated.
1. Form 29. Style of VITALIS of La Graufesenque. Similar
fan-taUed plant flanked by diverging serrated pointed leaves with
pinnate leaflets occurs on 29, OF VITAL, Vindonissa (Knorr 1919,
80 OANTEBBUBY EXCAVATIONS IN 1945
83 E and 84 K) and on 29 RottweU (ibid. 84M). Vespasianio. C4
with joining fragments from C6 and C7. (PI. IV, 1.)
2. Form 37, two fragments. By BIRACILLVS of Banassac.
Of. O. 2050 and 2096. Domitianic; A.D. 80-90. D4. (PL IV, 2.)
(ii) Plain.
1. Form 18. Stamped NI[. By NIGER of La Graufesenque.
Claudian; A.D. 45-50. D4. (Fig. 4, 5.)
2. Form 27. Stamped OFYAL. by VITALIS of La Graufesenque.
Vespasianio. C7. (Fig. 4, 6.)
3. Form 27. Stamped OF VITA. By VITALIS of La Graufesenque.
Although the stamp occurs at Claudian Hofheim the
absence of a groove on the footstand indicates a Vespasianio date here.
D4. (Fig. 4, 7.)
4. Form 33. Stamped BIGA FEC. By Biga of La Graufesenque.
Domitianic ; A.D. 80-90. D4. (Fig. 4, 8.)
The remaining Samian sherds, 39 in number, are mainly Flavian.
There are a few survivals, five Claudian and two probably Neronic.
There is also a very slight Trajanic element limited to two fragments,
from a smaU 33 and a 30. The forms represented among the Flavian
sherds are 18, 18/31, 27, 33, 35, 36 and 37.
(b) Coarse Ware. (Fig. 6, 1-14.)
1. Cooking-pot with simple thickened rim ; slight offset at base
of rim ; smooth black ware with combed decoration. Belgic. Cf.
Richborough I, 21 ; mid-lst century. A5.
2. Storage jar with heavy roUed rim; groove at base of neck ;
buff ware with combed decoration. Belgic. C5.
3. Jar with cordoned neck and shoulder ; fine grey ware. Belgic.
Cf. Richborough II, 144; at Richborough probably 1st century and
compared with a London.example dated A.D. 70-100. A5.
4. Jar with cordoned neck; fine burnished black ware. Belgic
type related to No. 3. A5.
5. Jug-neck with smaU disc rim; fine red-buff ware. D4.
6. Bowl with down-turned rim, shghtly convex rim ; burnished
black ware with tooled trellis pattern. Cf. Richborough III, 339 ;
A.D. 80-120. C4.
7. Carinated flanged bowl with ledge for hd ; sandy blaok ware.
C£ Richborough I, 22 and HI, 215 ; mid lst-early 2nd century. Here
the neck is shorter. C6.
8. Flanged bowl with girth grooves on body, sandy grey ware. C6.
9. Bowl in imitation of Samian form 18/31 ; smooth reddish ware.
Early 2nd century. A7.
10. SmaU ovoid jar with short concave neck and beaded rim.;
rough-surfaced reddish ware. A6.
OANTEBBUBY EXCAVATIONS IN 1945 81
pwwsssws
?
7
<> 1
EIG. 6. BURGATE STREET SITE.
Coarse ware from the late lst-early 2nd century deposits (J).
82 OANTEBBUBY EXCAVATIONS IN 1945
11. Jar with reeded thickened rim ; rough grey ware. Somewhat
akin to Verulamium, Fig. 31, 42, a type there common in the first half
of 2nd century. A7.
12. Beaker with short sharply everted rim and bulbous body;
thin smooth grey black ware decorated rouletting. Cf. Richborough
I, 62. 04.
13. Carinated jar with cordon at base of neck ; thin smooth black
ware. Cf. Richborough III, 289/90; A.D. 80-120. A7.
14. Mortarium with wide flanged and beaded rim ; cream ware.
Stamped ORBISSA FE cf. C.I.L. XIII, 10006, 64 from Beauvais
and Boulogne. A London example in GuildhaU Museum. Flavian.
C5.
I I I . FEOM THE MID-2ND CENTURY DEPOSITS.
(a) Coin. Antoninus Pius. A.D. 145-61. Sestertius; good
condition. M. and S. 772. C8.
(b) Samian.
(i) Decorated.
1. Form 37. By CENSORINVS of Lezoux. Cf. the Bacchus,
acanthus, bud rosette, wavy line on a London specimen (Oswald coU.).
Trajan-Hadrianic ; A.D. 115-125. D5. (PI. IV, 3.)
(ii) Plain.
1. Form 27, base, rather large. Stamped VERECV. By
VERECVNDVS of La Graufesenque. Vespasianio. C8. (Fig. 4, 9.)
2. Form 18. Stamped PATR/. By PATRICD7S of Lezoux.
Trajanic. A8. (Fig. 4, 10.)
3. Form 27, base. Stamped /CVRVS F. By COCVRVS of
Lezoux. Cf. 27, COCVRVS F, London (B.M.). Probably Trajanic.
A8. (Fig. 4, 11.)
4. Form 18/31, smaU. Stamped Z>VCI. By ALBVCIVS of
Lezoux. Trajan-Antonine; probably Hadrianic. A8. (Fig. 4, 12.)
5. Form 38, with high glaze. By ALBVCIVS of Lezoux. Cf.
0.andP.LXXII,Z,Silchester. Hadrian-Antonine. C8. (Fig. 4,13.)
The unUlustrated sherds (16) represent forms 15, 27, 18/31, 31, 33,
37, 38 and 81. They include survivals as weU as Hadrian-Antonine
material.
(c) Coarse Ware. (Fig. 7, 1-9.)
1. Cooking-pot with short everted rim, cordoned neck; smooth
black ware, rough below neck, decorated obhque slashes. Belgic.
Cf. Richborough TH, 244. C8.
2. Dish, simple rim and obhque sides; burnished black ware
decorated tooled lines. C8.
OANTEBBUBY EXCAVATIONS IN 1945 83
3. Poppy-head beaker ; fine black ware decorated panels of studs.
Cf. Richborough I, 54 ; Antonine. A8.
4. SmaU jar, wide-mouthed, recurved rim, girth-groove round
body ; sandy grey ware. Cf. Richborough II, 144 ; 1st century. A8.
5. SmaU jar ; black burnished ware, roughened on neck and body,
tooled decoration. C8.
6. Cooking-pot, everted rim ; smooth black ware. C8.
?i j
%
3WJ
MS X
t
^#¥
Previous
Previous
The Old Royal Faversham Powder Mills and its Storekeeper
Next
Next