( 54 )
SOME KENTISH INDENTS, II
BY R. H. D'ELBOUX, M.C, M.A., E.S.A.
CLDOTE AT HOO
I. At the westerly end of the north aisle is a weU preserved coffinshaped
slab of early fourteenth century date in memory of Jone, wife
of John Ram. Its inscription was noted by Thorpe (Registrum
Roffense, p. 744), it then being in the nave. It now has two brass
stops only left in it, though in Fisher's time more remained, as the
accompanying illustration, made from one of his experimental lithographs,
shows. To Fisher must be accorded the honour of being one
of the pioneers of lithography in England, and Fisher was a Kentish
man. Neither Joan, nor John Ram has been identified. Wills show
the family at Halstow in the late fifteenth century. Theh arms,
sable, 3 rams' heads cabossed argent, horned or, are quartered by
Alchorne in the 1619 visitation, brought in by Walsingham, and the
Alchorne pedigree, by commencing with a John Lone (given as Loue
in the pedigree, erroneously Mr. Griffin considered) who married
Margery, heiress of WiUiam Ram, son of Thomas, son of John Ram
Knight, takes one chronologicaUy to the period of this tomb. A John
Ram occurs in April 1348 in a court roU of the manor of Ambre*,
Rochester (Arch. Cant. XXIX, p. 129) and this date, too, fits pleasantly
for the period of the inscription.
a
© .w ®i tonl N »
*
M \
«
mm
CLIFF AT HOO, JONE w. OF JOHN RAM.
II. Immediately to the south of the altar raUs gate hes a slab,
4 feet 3 inches by 7 feet 10 inches, with a very worn indent of &
bracket brass; it shows a demi-effigy of an ecclesiastic beneath a
canopy and side shafts; about the stem of the bracket is entwined
a scroU; level with the canopy on either side is the indent of what
appears to have been a censing angel, and level with the stem on either
SOME KENTISH INDENTS, II 55
>
*1
:'
'.JVC
V
'V,
"•es
I
i • ii-?/ *q* T$
\
s^sr tut
1 -M
-I f si
M L " .&• •)
"•"*&»
* '- .
-^<£
/
\
J ' '
* i i i
\ .. if
••V. .r'.dr
;;v ., ,$. i> •>
| ^-v." •' ' , # '!?"* ^..-r,.-^"'
\ % ®f' "•>.' ">v •••? ** ^l''i '
':M' ""^^ ':'*'< >'
-•.\">"
"li -"X
CLIFF AT HOO, I I .
56 SOME KENTISH INDENTS, II
-• •~.Cf3 -•—v.-e.,^
0
!
ft
ft
=*-. re* ''X
y
t* ^*. * ""*••-• JS-%—
i ( ^
* y •' in
• it ••'
i 1 U
{ I
•0 <~ 1-
V
] I
Vi L
I
** IWk v.'*-* - . - . ..
CLIFF AT HOO, III,
SOME KENTISH DSDENTS, EC 57
side a shield. The lower part of the slab is covered by the altar rails,
but projects beyond them into the sanctuary, and on this part is some
indication of the stem termination, quite indeterminate.
Bracket brasses, as Macklin remarks, are by no means common.
Of nineteen hsted by him, three, aU of early fifteenth century date, are
in Kent, so that this, though worn, is a noteworthy addition to the
County's hst. From the indications remaining it appears to be of the
second half of the fourteenth century, and may with confidence be
assigned to either of two rectors, Robert de Walton, 1376, whose will
specifies that he was to be buried at the choir entrance, or Thomas de
Lynton, 1387-8, who wished to be buried in the chancel entrance
between the gate and the tomb of Robert Walton, and to have
" quemdam marmoreum lapidem honestum supponendum" (See
Testamenta Cantiana, p. 12).
The scroll is inclined to be a late feature of a bracket brass, and
so weighs the balance in favour of Thomas de Lynton, who desired
the good and sufficient marble stone, a reference which in most cases
included a brass therein.
III. At the entrance to the sanctuary is a fairly well preserved
slab, 41 by 83 inches, showing the indent of a priest in cope, beneath
a canopy with side shafts, and an inscription below. Level with the
central finial of the canopy, on either side of the composition, is a shield.
At first glance this would appear to be a normal type for the early
fifteenth century, but it has one particularly interesting variation.
The priest's figure was apparently shown three-quarter face, to judge
by the head's outline, the shape of the ahnuce, and the line of the
cassock at the base, with his hands in prayer to a saint enshrined in
the dexter shaft, at the junction of shaft and canopy. The ingenuity
of the lattoner must often have been taxed to provide variations of
the fashionable forms of brasses, but nowhere has a saint occurred on
a brass in such a position, and in this respect the indent is unique.
Its identification is unknown. A previous writer (Arch. Cant.
XLI, 85-6) ascribed it to Thomas de Lynton, but that is impossible
on stylistic grounds. John Prentys was Rector of Chff 1413-1445,
and might be a claimant, but 1445 seems on the late side for the
date of the indent. His predecessor, Nicholas de Ryssheton, 1403-
1413, agrees best with the style of the slab. He also was Canon of
Sarum and does not specificaUy mention burial at Chff, but his bequests
to the repah of the chancel and rectory, and to various images, infer
residence and a lively interest in the place, so that this slab might
weU be his. He mentions (Test. Cant. p. 12) his bequests are given
" because the church was dedicated to the Holy Cross " ; this suggests
a particular devotion to the Holy Cross. The church is, in fact,
dedicated to St. Helen who discovered it and the saint in the side shaft
was possibly her image.
58 SOME KENTISH INDENTS, II
IV. At the east end of the nave, between the north aisle and the
body, is an indent to a male civilian of c. 1440, so worn that reproduction
would be wasted effort. It has previously been reported as a figure
of a priest.
V. In Archceologia Cantiana, Vol. XI, p. 154 is reported a now
invisible indent, covered between the years 1869-1876, of a " smaU halflength
brass of an ecclesiastic under the tUes in the middle of the chancel
between the choh seats. It was so shattered that it was left as it was,
and the levelling for the tUes just aUowed them to cover it . . . "
Tastes change, and in these days encaustic tiles are not considered
essential for chancel paving. Even the ubiquitous coco-nut matting
is being discarded for harbouring dust when church cleaning is a
weekly problem. But restoration at Cliffe was on the whole kindly
to the slabs, so one must conclude this demi-effigy was indeed
" shattered ".
COOLING.
In the centre of the nave hes a weU preserved indent on a slab
25 by 60 inches, of a sixteenth century civilian with three wives and a
separate inscription below. Above the head of the male is the indent
of a curious badge, so far unidentified. It is not the shape of any
known badge of the Browne family.
It may mark the grave of Richard Browne who, in his will
(Rochester Wills, Vol. 8, f. 261) of 12th December, 1530, deshed to be
buried in " y6 mydyU Alley " and bequeathed a cow for burial fee.
In his wiU mention is made of only two wives, Agnes and Alicia, but
the wording leaves it uncertain if there were not two named Agnes,
and the date of the indent agrees with the date of his death. His
wUl is summarized as follows :—
Forgotten tithes 12d; Roodlight 12d; S4 James' hght 2d ; Our
Lady hght 2d ; Richard Vnygthall, godson 4d ; S* Andrew's, Rochester
4d ; remainder to Agnes his wife, after payment of debts, burial, and
month's mind: she executor with John Braybroke, John Love of
Cowlyng and Thomas my son: witnesses Thomas BaUarde, George
Bonham, James Jacob and Thomas MarchaU.
WiU: tenement and lands to Agnes for hfe, she to do reparations
as tenant; then to Thomas, my son and his heirs; if he die within
age or without heirs then the house and lands to be administered by
the executors and churchwardens, never sold, & the rents devoted to
my soul and those of my wives Agnes and Ahcia, and my children's
souls.
STBOOD.
There was, in the old parish church of Strood, certainly up to
c. 1800, and probably until its destruction in 1812, a slab 7 feet by
SOME KENTISH INDENTS, H 59
COOLING ? RICHARD BROWNE.
60 SOME KENTISH LNDENTS, II
2 feet 6 inches, whereon were the brasses of Thomas Glover and his
three wives, an inscription recording his death in 1444, and indents
for corner shields, the bottom sinister alone remaining. The demolition
of the old church, to make way for the present erection, started in the
nave, from which aU monuments were moved to the chancel, which
was boarded up, whUst the parishioners used Frindesbury. When
the chancel was puUed down, the monuments were placed in the tower,
and fovmd an eventual resting place, together with innumerable barrow
loads of rubble, beneath the present nave floor on the completion of
the new buUding. The late Mr. Henry Smetham in part penetrated
this accumulation, which apparently was dumped upon the floor
level of the old church, but neither he nor more recent seekers found
this lost slab, which nevertheless may stiU be there amongst
uninvestigated rubble.
LuckUy, Thomas Fisher had made a scale drawing of it, here
reproduced. In style it was like dozens of others of its period, the
only point worthy of comment being the variety of treatment of the
wives' head coverings. AU the heads were evidently worn, and the
faces partly redrawn by Fisher. His sketch of the whole slab, which,
according to the wUl, cost £4 6s. 8d., shows the brass shield blank.
Thorpe, however, in noting the brass (Registrum Roffense, p. 736) also
noted the shield, which bore " A pah of shears between two gloves
erected ". The inscription reads :—
%ii, Jfacent ^flomaa &iouv
Previous
Previous
John Philipot M.P. Somerset Herald 1624-1645
Next
Next