
Springhead: Temples III and IV
Contributions to the next volume are welcome. See the guidance for contributors and contact Editor Jason Mazzocchi. Also see the guidance for peer review.
Search page
Search within this page here, search the collection page or search the website.
Eltham Palace
Mary-le-bone Hill, Sandwich
SPRINGHEAD : TEMPLES III AND IV.
By W. S. PENN, B.So.
PART I. GENERAL
INTRODUCTION
THIS report continues the account of the temple complex at Springhead.
Temple I was described previously (1) and the present report considers
Temples I I I and IV. Their relationship to Temple I is shown in Fig. 1.
Temple I I will be described subsequently. No attempt wUl be made
to consider the overall implications of the complex until details of aU
temples have been reported. In this connection it is sufficient at
this stage to record the discovery of Temple V.
SUMMARY
Temples III and IV are both extremely interesting though
problematical buildings.
Temple III is a simple rectangular building 29 ft. by 19 ft. 4 in.
externaUy with waUs 36 in. thick. Some doubt exists regarding its
former purpose but, for reasons discussed later, the best explanation
so far is that it was a " sacred pool " into which pottery offerings were
made.
Temple IV was a small shrine measuring only 12 ft. 4 in. by 7 ft. 7 in.
internaUy. It had a cult statue base and its most interesting feature
was the four infant foundation burials discovered in the floors.
GeneraUy, individual dating of strata is not given in the body of
the report. Details of dating for them is given in Tables 1 and 2.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The farmers Messrs. J. Bartholomew and Sons again aUowed us
unrestricted use of One Tree Field for our work. We are most grateful
for these faculties.
Various authorities were again kind enough to give us the benefit
of their advice. Mr. S. Frere, M.A., F.S.A., offered some useful comments
on the significance of the Temple IV burials. Special thanks
are also due to Mr. R. A. G. Carson, M.A. for deahng with the coins ;
Miss D. Charlesworth, M.A., for the report on the glass and Miss Meikle
for the drawing of the glass, Fig. 6.10 ; Mr. N. Cook, B.A., F.S.A., of
the GuUdhaU Museum for cleaning the bronze necklace from Temple
IV and Miss H. A. H. Maedonald for the petrographical report on the
fragment of marble discovered in Temple IV.
113 i i
SPRINGHEAD : TEMPLES III AND IV
The author wishes to thank his colleagues for their help which has
made this report and previous reports possible. Mr. E. Tilley is our
" site secretary " and is responsible for cleaning, classifying and describing
aU the smaU finds except the pottery. He also deals with the
coins on site, and also acts as our Honorary Curator for the Chantry
Museum where aU Springhead finds are kept. Mr. W. Gee is the " site
artist " and is responsible for all the drawings in this and all reports.
His work has been particularly tedious this year because of the considerable
amount of pottery, but the standard of his work is always
exceUent. Mr. P. ConnoUy is the " site photographer " and is responsible
for aU the photographs in this report. There are, of course,
many hundreds of other photographs of the site which he has taken.
I am grateful to them all for their assistance.
Of the excavators, the author wishes to offer special thanks to Messrs.
E. TUley, W. Gee, G. Buries, F. Turner, P. Connolly and R. Ivell.
Others who assisted include Messrs. S. Harker, R. Bartlett, P. Anderson,
D. Ford and many other friends of Springhead who help from time to
time.
The work at Springhead is carried out by the Excavation Committee
of the Gravesend Historical Society. The author is indebted to the
President, Chairman and CouncU of the Society for their help and
encouragement during the year. AU excavators are grateful for the
support of the members of the Society. Funds from the Carnegie
(U.K.) Trust were also used again for which we are grateful. Miss
Taylor of the Journal of Soman Studies kindly loaned the block for
Figure 4.
PART II.
TEMPLE III
INTRODUCTION
The plan of Temple I I I is given in Fig. 1 (Plate IA). The building
was not strictly a temple since neither the priest nor the worshippers
entered it. However, it was a sacred building within the temenos
and is thus conveniently caUed Temple III, particularly since its
exact purpose is unknown.
The buUding is north of Temple I and only about three feet from it.
I t was discovered by crop marks and appeared to be similar to the
so-called " priest's dwelling " discovered by Sir Mortimer Wheeler (2)
by the side of the temple on Maiden Castle. It was expected that the
excavations would offer further evidence regarding the purpose of
such buUdings.
STRUCTURAL FEATURES AND DATING
In antiquity the whole of the northern part of the temenos was
excavated to make a shallow depression (Fig. 1). This was fiUed with
114
FIGURE I. POSITION OF TEMPLES
.-p-pHor.M'ATr'i'MrrorTH-A-tK-R-ATr
TfM ~~~——_ " " M A N WATLINO
-"^:-4^* r«e« CH
OPUS SIC.
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
TEMPLE HI
! z I
i © i
i ~ i
i *~
i <-» i
i UJ i
1 t/1 1
-. "s
• I
M COU R T Y A R P * »!
0
0 I 2 I A 5 iO
FIG. 1. Position of Temples,
S E C T I O N , FIGURE 2
T E M P LE © T E M P L E l\\
55$X£kSSK§S5 <&^<\\K<\K^