BROOMWOOD BRONZE AGE SETTLEMENT
ST. PAUL'S CRAY, KENT
By JOHN PARSONS
DISCOVERY
ONE September afternoon during the Battle of Britain in 1940 the writer,
then a schoolboy, hastily took cover in one of the shallow depressions
on the edge of the Broomwood hilltop as the battles raged in the skies
above. Afterwards, looking for some " souvenirs " (as was the custom
of schoolboys at that time) the author found a flint, shaped somewhat
like an arrowhead, on the ground. This strange " souvenir " was sent
in due course to the British Museum for confirmation. It was returned
identified not as an arrowhead but certainly as being of human workmanship
; so providing the first evidence of occupation.
Over the years periodic visits were paid to the hilltop and other
flint artefacts were found within the area.
In 1952, on an occasional visit, the author was dismayed to discover
that the Broomwood site was being devasted by bulldozers, prior to
the erection of a church upon the hilltop. Permission was urgently
sought to examine the area from the then priest-in-charge, the Rev.
J. F. Sertin, B.A., who readily gave his consent.
Consequently, the writer was able to record certain features of the
Broomwood site and take photographs before the complete destruction
of the whole Bronze Age settlement. It is upon these details that the
present report is based.
However, it is regretted that the Broomwood site should have been
destroyed before full investigations could be made, as such sites are
rarely reported in Kent. Fortunately, some account at least of the
Broomwood Bronze Age homestead is placed upon permanent record
in this report.
SITUATION
As previously stated, the Broomwood settlement was situated upon
a hilltop (250 ft. O.D.) which was a natural defensive position, with a
panoramic view of the surrounding countryside. The actual position
of the site is N.G.R. 4650: 6915, and it lies some half a mile west
of the Parish Church of St. Paulinus, overlooking the Cray Valley in
the parish of St. Paul's Cray.
At present the newly-built church of St. Barnabas Cray crowns
the hilltop formerly occupied by the Bronze Age encampment, and,
134
BROOMWOOD BRONZE AGE SETTLEMENT
no doubt, the site will be officially handed over to the new ecclesiastical
authorities in due course, forming the nucleus of a new parish of St.
Barnabas Cray.
The old name of " Broomwood " is derived from the abundant
brooms, used in the past for basket and brush making by local people,
which formerly edged the wood.
The name Broomwood now survives in a local road, and a pubhc
house recently erected nearby bears the same name.
BRONZE AGE ENCAMPMENT.: BROOMWOOD
ENTRANCE
£«tl
HUT
ENCLOSURE
HUT
MiU mrMlTnTnTlTril ENTRANCE
10 20 so •tb BO V- SCALE IN FEET /). T.J r»RSo»s.i1&o
PIG. 1. Plan of Enclosure.
Broomhill and Bromley are other place-names in this part of Northwest
Kent with the same prefix.
Although water was not immediately available in the Broomwood
site it could be obtained from a spring some 200 yards away to the west.
Geologically, the hilltop was capped with a deposit of black Blackheath
Bed pebbles which covered the underlying Thanet Sands of the
area.
The natural vegetation, if we may judge by the Broomwood, was
composed of birch, chestnut, and elm, with oaks predominating upon
the Bronze Age site itself. Most of these appeared to be less than a
century old, but the Broomwood has existed at least since 1769 judging
by Andrew's map of that time, and has never been under plough.
135
BROOMWOOD BRONZE AGE SETTLEMENT
Several old trackways pass near to the encampment, and these in
some cases were deep " hollow-ways ", although their prehistoric origin
cannot be confirmed. At least one dene-hole (N.G.R. 4670 ; 6897)
was in evidence within the boundary of the wood, and others may also
have existed in the vicinity.
Bronze Age artefacts are common in Kent, but actual occupational
sites of the period are rare. Only two other such sites are known in
this area of N.W. Kent, one at Orpington (Goddington N.G.R. 4692 :
6500), and the other Hayes Common (where there is a concentration of
hut circles, some at least of which are probably of Bronze Age date).
A brief mention of the Broomwood site has already appeared in
the 1952 Report of the Cray Antiquarian Association (see Archceologia
Cantiana, Vol. LXX (1956), 263). All finds from the site are at present
in the possession of the writer. It is hoped to present them in due
course to the Priory Museum, Orpington, when the reorganization of
this building is completed.
DESCRIPTION
The Bronze Age encampment occupied a rectangular enclosure
(measuring approximately 120 feet by 60 feet), bounded by banks
formed by earth from the interior of the site. No trace of an exterior
ditch was discovered.
In the centre of both the eastern and western sides of the enclosure
the earthen banks had been cut through (see Plan). This feature may
have indicated the original entrances to the encampment, although
the western one could have been relatively modern, connected with the
cultivated clearing between Broomwood and the neighbouring Hoblingwell
Wood.
Inside the encampment two circular depressions (roughly 10 feet
in internal diameter) could be observed in the north-west and southeast
corners respectively. Each was surrounded by an earthen bank
or wall : part of which was, in each case, incorporated into the main
enclosure bank. Although it is possible that other hut circles may have
existed within the enclosure, it was only possible to obtain a section
through one during the destruction, and this is now described in detail.
First, it must be stated that the section was accidentally exposed
during the bull-dozing of the site and may not represent a true crosssection
of the hut site itself. The diameter of the hut as exposed was
only 7 feet across internally. However, from the section (see Fig. 2)
the following details can be observed :
(a) The base or floor of the hut has been excavated into the natural
soil to a depth of 2 feet below the present ground surface. However,
the present surface may not represent the actual Bronze Age ground
level inside the encampment.
136
BROOMWOOD BRONZE AGE SETTLEMENT
(b) A small drainage ditch 6 in. deep and 18 in. wide has been dug round
the hut. The lip of this ditch may represent the true ground level
in the Early Bronze Age.
(c) A large post-hole (diameter 6 in.) appears in the section. Thi3 has
been sunk some 6 inches into the suggested ground level of the
Bronze Age times. Another " stake-hole " can be observed in the
edge of the drainage ditch, again sunk into the same surface level.
BRONZE AGE HUTMENT: BROOMWOOD
ST. PAUL'S CRAY. A. J . J . PARSONS, isao
KEY m TOPSOll UEAf MOULD/
•*s>\^ yz. YELLOW GRAVELLY
SANDY GREY PEBBLES
S
V \ SLACK HUMUS V/ V \ BROWN GRAVELLY // \^ \ LOOSE BLACK PEBBLES « \ \
/ / \ \
// -<—SUGGESTED ROOF POLES—>
/ / \ \ / / N> N / / V \ / ' Ii * Jj/^f-A i< rY.'i'.lS f*h.Je rMl
ik_K .< •V
/ /
/
v/
vtrc„J V1 \
t f
PI TCH J K^STAKZ POST *Ol
I SCALE IN fEEf
PIG. 2. Section Across Hut Site.
(d) In the centre of the hut floor there appears to be a layer or platform
of larger pebbles to a height of 4 inches above it.
(e) The whole of these features mentioned above are dug into the hard
whitish layer of natural Thanet Sand underlying the area.
(f) Initial filling of the hut appears to be loose black pebbles from
the surrounding capping layer of Blackheath Beds.
(g) The hut and its associated features are sealed by a primary layer
of brown gravelly soil, followed by subsequent layers of soil and
humus (to an approximate depth of 20 inches).
Although no actual flint artefacts were excavated in situ from the
above section, many were recovered from the immediate area of the
hut. In all some 500 examples of worked flint were coUected from the
Broomwood hilltop, a selection of which is illustrated (see Appendix).
No doubt many more existed on the site but could not be recovered
during the destruction of the settlement by bulldozing.
137
BROOMWOOD BRONZE AGE SETTLEMENT
INTERPRETATION
The reconstruction of the Bronze Age habitation in Broomwood
from the surviving section is not difficult, if we take into consideration
examples discovered elsewhere and also similar constructions still
being used by primitive peoples in other parts of the world today.
Initially, the site would be cleared by axemen. Then, several
small trees would be selected and erected to form a conical structure.
This would be secured at the top and anchored to the ground by means
of stakes in a circle. Next, branches would be interlaced, basket fashion,
between the main tree supports. Turf would be stripped from the surrounding
area, and laid like tiles upon the timber frame of the structure.
Finally, a small drainage ditch would be dug round the hut and so
stop surface water flooding.
Internally, the hut floor would be dug out to a depth of 6 inches or
so, and the excavated earth deposited to form a circular bank internally,
securing the structure.
The hut entrance appears to be rather substantial, if one assumes
that the 6 inch post-hole represents part of this feature. No doubt
an equally strong timber served as a lintel above the doorway. No
central post-hole for a roof support was detected in the section which,
as previously mentioned, was not a true cross-section. However, the
raised platform of pebbles observed in the centre of the recorded section
of the hut floor may indicate the base for a central support.
No signs of an internal hearth were discovered. This is not unusual,
as even in modern Spain the author has seen similar structures with
cooking hearths built well away from the hut as a precaution against
destruction by fire. Many calcined flints, or " pot-boilers", were
found within the Broomwood encampment and these certainly suggest
that hearths were used. Incidentally, the black area of humus discovered
within the circumference of the Broomwood hutment (see Fig.
2) was decayed organic matter (possibly tree roots) which displayed
no sign of burning.
DATING
As so few authentic Bronze Age occupation sites and structures are
known in Britain, the author was reduced to compiling a list of reported
prehistoric dwellings and making an Analysis Table in order
to form some opinion upon the date of the Broomwood settlement.
Initially, of course, the Broomwood site was dated from the mass
of flint artefacts which were discovered there, a selection of which was
submitted to Mr. E. Alexander, O.B.E., of the British Museum, for
expert examination, who kindly confirmed that they belonged to the
Early Bronze Age (see Appendix).
138
BROOMWOOD BRONZE AGE SETTLEMENT
However, from following the Analysis Table of reported hut sites, it
will be seen that prehistoric dwellings seem to conform to certain
types, according to age. Agreed that later artefacts such as Roman
pottery have been found in earlier types of construction, but, generally,
each period of prehistory produces some distinct feature in domestic
architecture. Doubtless there are exceptions, and the author is well
aware of the hmitations of any analysis on the subject.
It will be seen from a study of the Analysis Table that the Broomwood
settlement can be safely assigned to the Bronze Age, possibly
belonging to the period of the Beaker people (c. 1900-1800 B.C.), for
the following reasons :
(a) The site cannot be Mesohthic because of the complete absence
of microliths, microburins, microcores, besides small flint flakes
in quantity, which are the predominating feature of Mesolithic
sites such as that found at Farnham, Surrey, etc. The author's
local experience of Mesolithic sites at Orpington (Well Hill Excavation
Report, see Arch. Cant., Vol. LXV (1952) 174-7) and
North Cray (ibid, Vol. LXX (1956) 262) confirm the impression that
the Broomwood encampment is not of Mesohthic date.
(b) Structurally the Broomwood hut circles bear no relationship to
Neolithic dwellings because they are circular in shape whereas
excavated huts of the Neohthic period are rectangular. Sites
as far apart as Haldon, Devon ; Lough Gor, Ireland ; and
Aichbuhl, Germany, have confirmed this feature of Neolithic
construction. Similar differences in shape exist between Neohthic
long barrows and the circular barrows of the Bronze Age
Beaker folk.
(c) If we examine the Bronze Age habitation sites reported (see
Analysis Table) it will be noticed that the huts are always circular
in shape. The sizes of the dwellings range from 10 to 20 feet
in diameter. The materials used in construction depend upon
those immediately available in the area. However, those built
of stone in timberless country such as Dartmoor tend to survive
more than those made of less lasting materials, such as wood,
in stoneless regions like N.W. Kent. It is from the former, i.e.
stone constructions, that much of the knowledge of Bronze Age
domestic architecture is derived. The features of the Broomwood
site can be seen to be closely paralleled with Bronze Age buildings
discovered elsewhere ; especially so in the case of the Beaker
flint miners' huts on Easton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire, where
traces of earlier rectangular Neolithic buildings were also discovered
on the site (see Prehistoric Britain by Grahame Clark
(1953), p. 30).
139
BROOMWOOD BRONZE AGE SETTLEMENT
(d) That the Broomwood settlement could be as late as the Iron Age
need not be considered because occupational sites of this period
yield a wealth of domestic rubbish, including much pottery—an
item which was singularly absent from the Broomwood encampment.
APPENDIX
The Broomwood settlement, although thus dated to the Early
Bronze Age, yielded no evidence of bronze or bronze working. This
is not unusual on sites of this period because bronze was relatively
rare and, consequently, would not be possessed by such a poor community
as inhabited the Broomwood site during the period.
Due to the acidity of the soil no trace of wood, bone, or other
occupational material, apart from worked flints, survived.
The flint flakes and implements could be divided roughly into two
types, according to their patination. One type had the newness and
blueness of struck flint, whilst the other type was bleached into a
mottled grey-white discoloration. There were 175 of the former
and 287 of the latter. Mr. Alexander commented as follows :
" The implements fall into two distinct series characterized by the
difference in the flint used and in the working. In spite of these differences
I think that both series belong to the Bronze Age." As it
appears that the hut circles once had a small drainage ditch round their
perimeters, a feature not observed in connection with the larger enclosure
bank, it is suggested that the huts were founded first and,
some time later, an enclosure built to contain them. This possibly
may explain the two kinds of flint artefacts which Mr. Alexander reports
upon.
Calcined flint nodules or " pot-boilers" occurred in quantity,
and some thirty-five specimens were collected of average diameter
2 inches.
Only one example of a hammer stone was found, but this exhibited
all the features of a well-used implement. It weighed 10 ounces.
DESCRIPTION OP THE FINDS (FIG. 3)
.4. Semi-circular or " e n d " scraper of lustrous bluish flint with
traces of an olive-coloured cortex and a white sub-cortex.
B. Semi-circular scraper of fawn-coloured flint with whitish cortex
remaining on unstruck surface. Steep scraping edge.
C. Semi-circular scraper of bluish flint with rough chalky cortex
partially covering the unemployed " face " of the implement.
D. Fine semi-circular scraper with features similar to last specimen
140
ANALYSIS TABLE
PREHISTORIC HUT SITES
Site
PABNHAM
FBENSHAM
NOBTH CRAY
N.K.
Shape
o
o
o
o
Size
10 ft. dia.
10 ft. dia.
10 ft. dia.
10 ft. dia.
Situation
North Downs
North Downs
North Downs
N.K.
Structures
2
2
2
1
Walling
Earth
Earth
Earth
Earth
Floors
Sunken
Sunken
Sunken
Sunken
Hearths
" Potboilers "
" Potboilers "
" Potboilers "
Central
Features
Possible post-hole at
entrance
" Working floors "
unearthed
Surface indication only
Thatched roof
Finds
Abundant artefacts
1,400 artefacts
Microcore and blades
N.K.
Remarks
Hazel nuts found
12 per cent, burnt
by fire
Not excavated
Realistic artist's
impression
General Reference
Proc. Prehist. Soc.
N/S Vol. V, P t . 1
(1939).
Surrey Arch. Coll.,
Vol. 50 (1946-7).
Archmologia Cantiana
Vol. L XX (1956).
J . R. Garood, Arch.
Remains (1946).
CONCLUSION : Mesolithic dwellings were small sunken pits of some 10 ft. diameter which yield vast quantities of micro-flints. •
LOOH GUB
AlCHBUHL
HALDON
RONALD SWAY
CZ3
a
t n
32' x 20'
30' x 20'
20' X 16'
24' x 12'
Lakeside
Lakeside
Moorland
Island
1 +
1 +
1
1
Wood
Wood
Wood
Wood
Level
Level
Level
Sunken
N.K.
Central
Corner
Central
Stone sleeper-walls
Timbered Flooring
Stone sleeper-walls
Stone sleeper-walls
Rubbish pit : glass
beads
Pottery and wooden
objects
Western Neolithic
pottery
Pot and food bones
under T/S
Restored for T.V.
programme
Timber finely preserved
Kitohen recess in
hut
Floor sunk to 1J-2J
ft.
P. Johnstone Buried
Treasure (1957)
G. Clark, Archaeology
and Society (1939).
J . C. Hawkes, Prehist.
Britain,
(1948).
R. Place, Down to
Earth (1954).
CONCLUSION : Neolithic Huts were rectangular wooden framed buildings with internal partitions and hearths
EASTON DOWN
BBOOMWOOD
HAYES COMMON
STANDON
TYMAUB
GBIMSPOUND
CHYSAUSTEB
SKABA BBAB
o
o
o=
( *
N.K.
10 ft. dia.
10-22' dia.
20 ft. dia.
15-20' dia.
6-25' dia.
20 ft. dia.
14-20' dia.
Moorland
North Downs
North Downs
Moorland
Island
Moorland
Moorland
Island
1 +
2 +
150+
60+
50 +
10+
8 +
7 +
Wood
Wood
Wood
Stone
Stone
Stone
Stone
Stone
Sunken
Sunken
Sunken
Sunken
Sunken
Sunken
Sunken
Sunken
N.K.
External
External
N.K.
Central
Central
N.K.
Central
Built on ruins of rectangular
Neolithic huts
" Porch " T/S. stake
holes
" Porch " T/S. external
fire-pits
N.K.
" Porch " T/S. Walls
4-6 ft. high
" Porch " T/S. Walls 4 ft.
high
" Porch " T/S. Walls
S£ ft. high
" Porch " T/S. Walls
8 ft. high
M.B.A. cemetery
nearby
Flint artefacts
Flint artefacts
" Grain Rubbers "
Bronze tools under
floor
Round based pottery
N.K.
Stone Axes and
pottery
Floor sunk to 6-18
inches
Drainage ditch
Quoted as " Neolithic
"
Associated with J
acre " fields "
Roman pottery recovered
Clay/Stone paved
floors
Drainage system
Drainage system
G. Clark, Prehist.
England (1953).
Archmologia Cantiana,
Vol. LXX
(1956).
A. E. Carey, Pre-
Man in E. Surrey
(1920 ?).
E. C. Curwen, Plough
and Pasture
(1946).
B.M. Guide to Bronze
Age (1904).
G. Clark, Prehist.
England (1953).
The Chysauster
Report (1928).
V. G. Childe, Skara
Brae (1931).
CONCLUSION : Bronze Age habitations were circular in shape and usually had a " porch " or sheltered entrance and a central support for the roof.
Abbreviations r M.B.A. = Middle Bronze Age. N.B. References quoted are main ones on sites listed, but also mention must be made of E.C
N.K. = Not known (information lacking). Curwen's Archaeology of Sussex (London, 1937) for further information on the subject of
T/S. = Table Stone/Stones possibly base for roof-support. hut-circles.
[face p. 140
BROOMWOOD BRONZE AGE SETTLEMENT
M ^ S j * ^ S5
SCALE -4- ONE INCH *
FIG. 3. Flint Implements.
Broomwood 4650/6915. St. Paul's Cray, Kent.
141
BROOMWOOD BRONZE AGE SETTLEMENT
E. Side scraper of most unusual form with a greyish-white patination.
Strong " backbone " suggests that it may originally have been
intended as a spearhead. Hafting flake has been removed from
the butt. Triangular cross-section.
F. Large side scraper of grey-blue flint with several flakes removed
from the length of its " backbone ", perhaps to facilitate holding
or hafting.
G. Small side scraper of greyish-white patination and traces of a chalky
cortex.
H. Small side scraper of bluish flint, with remains of a chalky cortex as
last.
/ . Bluish banded blade of somewhat Mesolithic appearance, with
hoUows worked on both edges. Treatment at butt suggests
hafting. Chalky cortex.
/ . Multitudinal shaft scraper or " hollow scraper " with worked
hollows of one inch, half inch, and quarter inch diameter, possibly
used for the preparation of spear and arrow shafts. (Compare
B.M. Guide Stone Age (1926) Figs. 114 and 211.)
K. Shaft scraper with half inch diameter notch. There is also a
secondary feature—a right-angled scraping edge.
L. Arrow shaft scraper, similar in features to the last specimen.
M. Combined blade and end scraper with possible indications of hafting
at the butt end. Mottled greyish-white flint. (Compare type of
implement see B.M. Guide Stone Age (1926), Figs. 64, 140, 199(g).)
Mr. Alexander, of the British Museum, further commented
as follows : " The three scrapers (B, C, D,) from Broomwood are
rather rough and degenerate Bronze Age types, although the big one
(D) is a fine specimen. I should date them rather late in the Early
Bronze Age. One cannot say for certain what scrapers such as your
Broomwood ones were used for—doubtless a variety of purposes. I
hope that the Maidstone Museum people saw the Broomwood site
before it was bulldozed. Bronze Age hut sites are not too common."
142