
The Len Water-mills
Contributions to the next volume are welcome. See the guidance for contributors and contact Editor Jason Mazzocchi. Also see the guidance for peer review.
Search page
Search within this page here, search the collection page or search the website.
The Cobham Family in the Administration of England, 1200-1400
Springhead: Temple VT/Gateway
lNTRODUOTION
THE LEN WATER-MILLS
By R. J. SPAIN
Tms study is but a sum total of existing knowledge available at the
time of composition. Nearly all the material involved is culled from
local public and private MS. collections and printed sources. Consequently
this history of the Valley Mills is predominantly concerned
with the last four centuries. Nevertheless, this shortcoming is well
balanced by the richness of the period. In these centuries the total
number of water-mills reached a maximum as did the number of
water-mills devoted to fulling and papermaking.
In Arch. Gant., lxxi, Robert Goodsall wrote a most interesting
paper on this same subject entitled 'Watermills on the River Len'.
Since then a considerable number of documents related to the mills
has been deposited in the Kent Archives Office, the most important
of these being the Leeds Castle Estate muniments. Added to these
accessions are extracts from local history books, descriptions of the
remaining mills and knowledge contributed by various people acquainted
with the mills.
F AIBBOURNE MILL
In the light of our present knowledge it seems very likely that
there was a mill at Fairbourne when the Domesday Survey was undertaken.
However, in fact, our first reference is dated 1580. It is to be
found in a 'Book of Quit Rents of Several Manors in Kent belonging
to Galfridon Mann Esq.' dated 1750.1 The handwritten entries nearly
all date from an original of 1579-80 including the rents for two manors
then existing in Harrietsham, East Farbourne and Holmill. Rents for
East Farbourne include:
'One year's rent of a messuage a tenement a Barn a Garden a
Watermill a Pond or Pool and 4 pieces of land containing by
estimation 20 acres of land whereof one piece is called Millandes
and one other piece is called Beggershill late of Edwar:a. Chamber,
William Chamber and Nicholas Chamber lying and being in
Harrietsham.'
Beside this account is the rent of nine hens. Further on a few pages
an identical set of entries for the manor dated the same year are
1 Kent Archives Office U24 M23.
32
l CHURCH 759 555
2. LITTLE CHURCH 760S55
3.PA0SOLE 764S56
4.CHRtSTIANS 768 557
S.TURKEY 772556
6.POLL 774 553
l OTHAM PAPER 78 7S46
8.0THAM CORN 791 S46
Cl THE COMB 8025S2
IQTHURNHAM 802 S47
THE LEN WATER MILLS
WITH 0.5. MAP REFERENCES
11.BALLARDS 804 547
i2.FULL ING 8 1 2 5 4 0
13.QLD 820541
14.LE NETHERTOUNE 823534
15.ABB.EY 823531
16.PRIORY 823530
17. PARK 832 542
18.GROVE 83S 545
19.EYHORNE CORN 835 546
20. HOLLINGBOURNE M ANOR 843 S52
Fro. 1.
i.
o7°'\j
.,.,,... ..... , __ ...;o.. ., ..,..,.... --
.,/'1 ,::.,r
r·-.. '-....... .................. )··:i
I ·•, "
21.-KEEPERS COTTAGE 831 536
2.THE MILE 834536
23. LE MILLE 83432
24.CASTLE 835S32
25. CHEGWORTH 850527
26.HOLME 860529
27. POLLHILL 861523
28. FAI RBOURNE 865S18
29. ALDINGTON 812 S73
\
THE LEN WATER-MILLS
written. Without exception all the rents are commuted to money.
For Fairbourne Mill two pence were paid instead of nine hens.
In a list of mills dated 1608 owned by James 12 occurs:
'Watermill, Fulborne, demised to Thomas Cakebread £2. 13. 4.'
This may refer to Fairbourne Mill, but some doubt exists. Much of
the royal milling property was disposed of shortly after this list was
made and the mill at Fairbourne may have been included. Certainly
no further evidence of royal ownership is known.
A rent roll of the Manor of Harrietsham 1694 in the possession of
Robert Goodsall mentions the occupier of Fairbourne Mill:
'Edward Hickmut (script damaged) Mills.'
The mill appeared on various maps throughout the eighteenth
and nineteenth centuries, with one of the first being of 1728.8
An interesting reference in the Archives to Fairbourne Mill is to
be found in a collection of documents concerning the Manor and
Lordship and Castle of Leeds, variously dated. 4 One of these documents,
a deed dated 1768 includes:
' ... and also all that one messuage or tenement with the millhouse
whereon a, Water Corn Mill had formerly stood ... in the parish
of Ulcombe and were heretofore part of the inheritance of Joseph
Hatch long since deceased and now in the occupation of Thos.
late Lord Culpeper and Thomas Stiles.'
The property mentioned was part of 'Lordship of Farbone alias
West Farbone together with all those two Water Corn Mills under one
roof'. The parties in the transfer were Francis Martin, widow, daughter
of Right Honourable Catherine Lady Fairfax, and the Rev. Denny
Martin of Leeds.
How old wa
s the former corn mill1 We have no way of telling. The
existing mill of this period had two pairs of stones. Apparently, even
as late as mid-eighteenth century, to have these under one roof is
noteworthy.
We are very lucky in having detailed information of the mill
during the late eighteenth century in the form of two old mill ledgers.
They were found by Mr. L. V. and Mr. T.V. Clark in 1929 when sorting
the effects of the late Thomas Clark, 1838-1929, miller of Fairbourne
and Corn Merchant. Later the ledgers were donated to Swadela.nds
Secondary Modern School, Lenham, to form pa.rt of the School Museum.
Mr. Turner, the headmaster, very kindly allowed me to examine then:>.
at length.
2 British :Museum, Lanadowne MSB.
3 0ood8aU MSB. Survey of the Estates of William Horsmonden Turner by
Alexander Bottle, 1728.
4 KAO U23Tll,
34
THE LEN WATER-MILLS
Both ledgers have Purchase and Sales sections. The earliest is
dated from 30th September, 1751 to 10th October, 1760 and the
second from 1st January, 1782 to 9th December, 1784. An examination
of both periods show that the mill work was nearly all with wheat,
varying at times from 60 to 95 per cent of the total output by weight.
The throughput of barley and oats was very similar, in the early
ledger comprising together perhaps 5 per cent of the mill output,
in the latter book nearer 40 per cent-perhaps witness of the growing
practice of milled animal feedstuffs . .A. negligible amount of peas and
beans were ground also.
All products of the mill were purchased in gallons, pecks, bushels,
sacks o r quarters and the amount, buyer and price carefully tabulated,
day after day. No sabbath entries are found. Assuming a working
day of approximately ten hours, the average hourly output was close
to ninety pounds. This from two pairs of stones, one for fine grinding
(wheat) and the other the hog corn or barley stone, is comparable to
modern outputs.
Milling terminology appears to have changed little. The various
stages of refinement and their relative weights as proportions of the
whole wheat output are:
Early Ledger Later Ledger Approx. % of whole
'wheat ground'
(i.e. first flour)
'wheat ground' 65
'Md' (middlings) 'coarse flour'
'2d' (seconds 01· 'wheat ground and dressed'
secondary flour) 'meal' 30
'Hd•' (headers from
the sieve?)
'pollard' 'pollard'
'hogcorn'
10
'bran' 'bran' 6
The later ledger shows a distinct increase in the number of refinements
and prices available to buyers. Much interesting information
could be gained from the two books, regarding prices, change in demand
throughout the year, distribution of sellers and buyers, etc.; but remains
outside the requirements of this study.
In 18475 and approximately 18556 a William Hudson was the
miller and farmer at Fairbourne Mill. Sometime soon after 1861
Thomas Clark moved in and was miller for some while. Although
6 S. Bagshaw, History, Gazetteer and Directory of the Oount,y of I{ent 1847
6 Post Ojflce, DirectoriJ of the Six Home Oounties, approx. 1856-61. '
35
THE LEN WATER-MILLS
Kelly's Directory of 1895 shows a Horace Hooke Clarke as miller of
Fairbourne this is not correct for Mr. L. J. Clark informed me that
his grand.father Thomas Clark remained at the mill until his death
in 1929. Much of the mill machinery was removed in 1908 when
milling ceased, although the water-wheel remained to operate a turbine
that was installed.
The existing mill building is red brick with weatherboard, a.s so many
were in Kent.
By some good fortune I was able to talk to a Mr. Gravel who
used to work in the mill many years before the First World War.
].\fr. Gravel confirmed that Fa.irbourne had two stones, one a flour
stone and the other for coarse grinding, though both could not be
used at once. In those days the mill produced only two refinements,
middlings and bran, sometimes taken together by customers for
malting wholemeal brea