OASTS IN KENT
AND EAST SUSSEX
PART Il
ANTHONY CRONK, F.S.A, F.R.S.A.
In the first part of this study, we traced the development of oasts from
the time of the introduction of commercial hop-growing to England,
until the end of the eighteenth century. Little has yet been said about
those who, through the centuries, laboured therein, and for whose use
they were built.
PLACES OF WORK
The hop-drier has always been a man of vital importance on any hop
farm. On his skill and judgement hangs the success or failure of the
whole year's endeavour. Freshly picked hops contain 75--83 per cent
moisture, which must be reduced to about 6 per cent before they can be
safely packed and stored. This means that in order to produce one
tonne of dried hops, just about three tonnes of water have to be driven
off. The drier has to regulate the kiln temperature and air-speed so that
this is done without scalding, scorching or discoloration. Since about
I 790, 1 it has been his practice to fumigate each kiln-load of hops by
burning beneath them a pan of brimstone, fumes of which impart extra
brightness to the appearance of the dried product.
Most critical of all, he has to decide when the hops have reach the
precise degree of required dryness befor.e unloading the kiln.
Dependent on a number of variables, including the ripeness and
moisture content of the green hops and the ambient humidity of the air
intake, the whole process usually takes between eight and twelve hours.
The most economic usage of kiln space calls therefore for two loadings
to be dried in a twenty-four hour cycle. In recent years the introductim
1 A. H. Burgess, Hops, Botany, Cultivation and Utilization, (1964), 8.
241
ANTHONY CRONK
of oil burners has ameliorated the drier's physical labour, but for
centuries when all hops were dried by solid fuel, constant stoking and
attention to the fires was necessary. The drier never left the oast from
the beginning of the week to the end, merely snatching an occasional
cat-nap on a palliasse, but ever vigilant over his precious charge.
Reynolde Scot (1574)2 assumes that the hop-planter himself would
attend to so important a task. Marshall ( 1798)3 refers to 'the judicious
kilnman', and implies that he is a trusted and responsible farm worker.
In either case, all hop-driers had to face the scorching heat of their
furnaces, the dusty sweat of heavy stoking, draughts of chilly night air,
the acrid fumes of burning sulphur, the sticky black resin of the hops
and the battle against drowsiness through the long hours and days.
More often than not, these men presented an appearance as black as
any sweep, their bloodshot eyes rimmed with fatigue. They were,
however, members of an elite.
There was a mystique about the rituals of their craft which depended
entirely on experience and sensory perception, and owed nothing to
scientific aids. William Ellis, referring to hop-drying in his Modern
Husbandman, 1750, recommended the use of thermometers, lately
invented by Dr Fahrenheit in 1714, but he added, 'common workmen
trust to their skill'. Indeed, it was not until the I 930s that hop-driers
were persuaded reluctantly to accept the aid of thermometers in their
kilns. The author recalls one indignant old drier holding out a horny
hand - 'This,' he said, 'is my thermometer' - and it must be admitted
that his results were consistently excellent.
After being unloaded from the kiln, the dried hops are allowed to lie
in golden heaps on the cooling floor in the stowage part of the oast
before being packed in 'pockets'.4 These are cylindrical sacks about
2 m. high when filled, and containing some 75 kg. of hops.
Until the mid-nineteenth century the pockets were filled by treading.
All that was required was a stout wooden frame let into the cooling
floor, in which was cut a circular hole the exact size of the mouth of the
pocket. Through this hole was suspended the pocket, its weight being
taken by an iron hoop resting on the surface at floor-level. After a few
shovelfuls of hops had been put in, a man descended into the pocket to
tread them firm. As soon as they were compacted, an assistant above
with a large shovel, or 'scuppet' as it is called, sent down a fresh supply,
upon the head of the bagster (as yet beneath the floor), and so on until
the pocket was filled with tightly trodden hops.
2 A Parfite Platforme of a Hoppe Garden, reprinted 1653 under the title A Perfect
Platform of a Hop Garden.
3 Rural Economy of the Southern Counties.
4 The term is an ancient one. There is a reference to 'pocketts of hops' in Riley,
Memorials of London, (1551), 666.
242
OASTS IN KENT AND EAST SUSSEX
The author of a book devoted to hop-growing, published in I 838, 5
wrote, 'this process of treading is a tedious and unpleasant work for the
men ... and occasions great thirst by the quantity of dust which arises,
the treader being as yellow all over as a sovereign, and the yellow dust
is very choking'. It must have been a great relief when this method was
superseded by the mechanical rack-and-pinion press in the later
nineteenth century.6
Even in buildings no longer used for hops, evidence of these holes in
the floor can often be adduced from a square frame foffiled in the floor
joists, visible from below. Where the hole was close to the wall of the
stowage, one can assume that it was made for treading, but for the
mechanical press it was necessarily positioned away from the wall to
allow room for the crank handles to be turned.
Some of the early rack-and-pinion presses were made at Hurst
Green, Sussex, by G. Pierson, ironfounder, or Tester and Son, but the
great majority were produced at the Waterside, Maidstone, foundry
works of W. Weeks & Son (successors to S. J. Knight). Examples are
exhibited at Maidstone Museum and the Wye College Agricultural
Museum.
Smallness of window area is a characteristic of oast stowages of all
periods. This is due to the fact that excessive sunlight is deleterious to
dried hops. Consequently, until the introduction of electric light,
stowage interiors tended to be somewhat gloomy.
Crude accommodation was provided for the drier and his assistants,
either as a lean-to annex or in a roughly screened portion of the
stowage. Perhaps some bunks where the men could snatch a rest
between their arduous labours, a fireplace where they could boil a
kettle, and a table whereon to eat an evening meal brought to them by
their wives after their own busy day picking in the hop-garden. In
bygone days, in some oasts, there might be a barrel of beer provided by
a thoughtful employer to assuage the 'great thirst' occasioned by the
work.
Any connection between a white-cowled oast nestling in some
remote and leafy farmstead and governmental bureaucracy may seem
surprising, but connection there was for a century and a half. From
1711 onwards (until repeal of the impost in 1862), an annual visitor to
every working oast was the exciseman. Every pocket or bag of hops
had to be weighed in his presence for assessment of excise duty, which
varied over the period between ld. and 21d. per lb. In some old oasts,
5 E. J. Lance, The Hop Farmer, (1838), 120.
6 A lever-operated press, illustrated by Lance, op. cit. 125, was a failure. H. H. Parker,
The Hop Industry, 1934, credits the invention of the rack-and-pinion press to 'Mr Ellis of
Banning'.
243
ANTHONY CRONK
the iron staple or hook may be found from which the official scales
were suspended.
A NEW AGE
The nineteenth century witnessed a further great expansion in hopgrowing.
Between the beginning of the century and 1878 the English
hop acreage doubled, most of this increase taking place in Kent and
East Sussex. Naturally, there was considerable experimentation and
development in the techniques of cultivation and curing.
In 1838 the drying floors were said to be 'sometimes made of tiles
perforated with numerous holes, and at others of wire or hair cloth'. 7
Smokeless Welsh anthracite coal, hauled here first by inland waterway
and then by the new railways, fuelled the customary open furnaces,
above which were suspended sheet-iron baffle-plates to protect the
hops from too-fierce radiant heat and sparks. But on some farms
various types of enclosed iron stoves and cockles were being installed,
most notable being Shew's Patent, which had zig-zag cast-iron flue
pipes through the plenum chamber. Such appliances could utilize a
variety of fuels, including gas-coke.
It was an age besotted with iron and steam. The above-mentioned
author of 1838 describes a contrivance for drying hops by hot water
pipes laid a few inches below the drying floor, connected to a boiler
with a dome head 'which feeds them', he says, 'with a continual supply
of boiling water and steam'. Applying heat by this method, he assures
us, is the cleanest method of drying, but 'admittedly very questionable
as to its success' (in fact it never got beyond the experimtal stage.) It
was soon realized that the thermal efficiency of the so-called pure air
systems was particularly low, due to the fact that a large proportion of
the heat generated was lost as it escaped with the products of
combustion up the outside flue. In an effort to make more efficient use
of heat, consideration began to be given to two-tier drying, which had
already been tried on the Continent. This entailed two drying floors,
one above the other, so that the green or moist hops could be
introduced to the upper floor and later dropped down to the lower for
final curing. The system was not popular in Kent or Sussex at that
time, though it is now showing some signs of resurgence.
ROUNDELS
Perhaps the most notable development in oast construction in the
nineteenth century was the introduction of the circular kiln, known as
the roundel. A number of contemporary writers are agreed in crediting
7 Excise regulations of 1835, quoted by H. H. Parker, op. cit.
244
OASTS IN KENT AND EAST SUSSEX
this invention to the fertile mind of John Read who died in 1847, aged
87, and was for many years an inhabitant of Horsmonden.8
It had long been recognized as of vital importance to good hopdrying
that the current of hot air should be evenly distributed over the
whole area of the drying floor. Many growers were under the
impression, erroneously as we now know, that there was a tendency for
the hops in the corners of a square or rectangular kiln to receive less
than their fair share of air movement. It was John Read who showed
them how to construct a kiln without corners, and moreover one
requiring the minimum amount of walling to enclose a given area. This
was the origin of what was to become one of the most typical features
of the landscape of Kent and East Sussex, an aesthetic form quickly
discovered by innumerable painters and photographers,9 but now a
sadly wasting asset, due to disuse, decay, demolition and
unsympathetic conversion to other uses.
The introduction of circular kilns coincided with the great
nineteenth-century prosperity of the industry, the speculative nature of
which appealed to the aleatory, risk-taking spirit of the age.
Landowners, eager to get on the newly profitable band-wagon, were
hastening to equip their farms, and the popularity of the roundel soon
spread. Among the earliest was one at Benenden (c. 1812) 10 and
another at Court Lodge, Brook, dated 1815. By 1848 S. Rutley, a
Kentish farmer writing in the Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society,
recorded that 'circular kilns are becoming every year more general
throughout Kent and Sussex, and are now brought to that perfection
that double the quantity of hops are dried on the same space and in a
superior manner'. Older kilns of 9-14 ft. square were being replaced by
roundels of up to 20 ft. in diameter, a substantial increase in drying
area. Occasionally, as at little Bewlbridge farm, Goudhurst, on the
Scotney Castle estate, roundels were added to an oast already equipped
with square or rectangular kilns (Fig. 1), all served by a single
stowage.
In spite of the rapid proliferation of roundels throughout the region,
there were those who resisted such innovation, such as another midcentury
writer11 who opined that 'with respect to the mode of drying
hops, the open square hopper kiln is most recommended, whereby the
8 A memorial bust of John Read, who was credited also with other inventions
including the stomach pump, may be seen in Horsmonden Church; vide A. Cronk, St.
Margaret's Church, Horsmonden, (1967), 73.
9 One of the earliest representations in art is a watercolour landscape by Edward
Duncan (1803-82), Fork Common (sic), near Sevenoaks, now in the Fitzwilliam Museum,
Cambridge. Modern artists, e.g. Rowland Hilder and Kenneth Denton, have made much
play with this subject.
10 Noted by P. H. Grattan, A History of Oasrhouses, (1961) (unpublished MS).
11 H. M. Manwaring, A Treatise on the Cultivation and Growth of Hops in the Kent
Style, (1855).
245
Key to Fig. I
a Stowage.
b Original kilns, eighteenth century
(external weatherboard, internal lath
and daub).
c Roundels, nineteenth century (brick
and tile construction).
d Charcoal store.
e Pressing hole above.
f Weatherboard cladding.
g Sandstone ashlar wall.
d
'
a
b
vr ➔) 11111 I
__ a ____ ,_ ___11::=1 .._ ____
/
t ,.
I I\
g
ft o l 4- I, & JO
M
11--. ,.L• . , ,... ,., ,,...,
0 l. 3
Fig. l. Oast at Little Bewlbridge Farm, Goudhurst.
OASTS IN KENT AND EAST SUSSEX
hops are dried more quickly and regularly, and are rendered of a better
colour and quality. A description of the kiln,' be says, 'may not be out
of place. If the kiln be twelve feet square at the top, it should be twelve
feet high from the fire, and the staddle should be six feet and a half
square; and so proportionably in other dimensions. The fireplace
should be about a foot square, and over it a small door or shutter
about eighteen inches square, which assists to regulate the heat. The
bed should be made of laths or rails, very even, about an inch thick and
the same distance apart, and covered with an oast hair ... A fire should
then be made of charcoal, coke of Welch coal, keeping it of a regular
heat, using brimstone at the front of the grate .... '
As the centuty wore on, however, it was the curcular kiln which came
to predominate. Necessarily, it was built as an integral structure,
having its own conical roof, independent of the rectangular stowage
building to which it was attached and to which it communicated at
both ground-floor (or furnace) level and at drying-floor level, which for
open coal firing had to be some four feet higher than the level of the
cooling floor. On the smaller farms a single roundel would be attached
at one end of a rectangular stowage, and the majority of oasts were on
this simple scale (Fig. 2). The average hop acreage on individual
nineteenth-century farms was less than six. In 1878, there were some
40,000 acres of hops in Kent alone, 12 which suggests a total of nearly
7,000 oasts in the county at that date.
At the upper end of the scale, on the farms of larger acreage, huge
edifices were constructed with anything from three to six, seven or eight
roundels arranged along one or both sides. These were the mark of the
great specialist hop-farms in that golden age of hop-growing.
The materials of which oasts were constructed tended to be
vernacular to the different parts of the region. Walls were sometimes of
brick, sometimes of local stone, such as Kentish rag or flint. Perhaps
the lower part of the kiln walls would be of stone, giving way to brick
above. At the eaves it was a common custom throughout the
nineteenth century for the vertical kiln walls to be topped with brick
Previous
Previous
Investigations and Excavations during the Year
Next
Next