Early Roman Burial in Dartford

EARLY ROMAN BURIAL IN DARTFORD PAUL HUTCHINGS with contributions by Malcolm Lyne, Jacqueline McKinley and Ian Riddler Alec Detsicas summarised the evidence for Roman settlement in Dartford in his volume on the Cantiaci, and usefully brought together accounts stretching back over almost a century (Detsicas I 983, 80). The Roman archaeology of Dartford remains elusive, although smallscale evaluations and excavations at its centre are beginning to develop our understanding. This small contribution by staff of the Canterbury Archaeological Trust and two external specialists is presented as a reminder of how useful Alec's survey has been, and how we are indebted to him. Following a desk-based assessment undertaken for the new Sainsbury' s supermarket at the Priory Centre in Dartford, an archaeological evaluation took place in advance of redevelopment. Three trenches (Fig. 1, Trenches 1-3) were cut across the area (presently Beadle's show court and car service area) to determine the presence or absence of any surviving archaeological remains. Work began in October 1998 and took place over three consecutive weekends under the direction of the writer. Further trenches were later opened in an area thought to contain Roman cremation burials (Trenches 4 and 5) but these yielded no additional evidence. A further two trenches were subsequently excavated in adjacent land formerly belonging to the Gala bingo hall (Trenches 6 and 7). These latter trenches provided some further evidence of Roman activity. A watching brief maintained during groundworks for the development also provided some additional information. The Priory Centre site (NGR: TQ 5400 7395) is largely flat with a slight downward slope from west to east. Located on flood plain gravel, overlying Upper Chalk, the site lies at +4.80m OD and is situated within the valley of the River Darent which is located approximately 1km to the east. Roman finds were reported during the building of the present car 103 Beadles office• Possible pyre debris ? } ' ----------1---------J ,-.---.J ' I _, PAUL HUTCHJNGS Gala car park I . Fig. 1 Site location; plan o f excavation trenches. Tr.3 / I adleslc..- 11 I: I L _ _ :􀀟owroom ___􀀠 Pyr e,/30yr F burial umed 599 .4 l ) adult min. op- IC, lL;ddd-S1; bird; burial >50 yr one oa - IT; exo. - iliac crest, glass 2) adult F proximal ulna, femur >18 yr shaft, left patella =9a 207.5 I) older F oa- lC, IT bird; adult glass ?2) adult KEY: op - osteophytes; ddd - degenerative disc disease; oa - osteoarthritis; exo. - exostoses; C- cervical; T- thoracic; L- lumbar; S - sacral Due to the nature of the archaeological investigations (see above) the remains of Cremation Burial 1 were not fully excavated and it has been estimated that c. 50 per cent of fills were remov·ed. The fragmentary nature of the three vessels comprising grave goods in Cremation Burial 1 suggests some level of disturbance to the deposit. The urned burial (Cremation Burial 2) was largely intact though there had been some disturbance damaging the upper 20 per cent of the vessel. The bone appeared in good condition, and included fragments of both compact and trabecular bone suggesting the soil conditions were not adverse to good bone survival (McKinley 199 7, 57). The remains of a minimum of two adults were identified, one from each burial. Most of the bone in Cremation Burial 2 and from the grave backfill (9) represents the remains of an elder female, but fragments from a second adult were recovered from both deposits. These additional fragments may represent the formal burial of a second individual, i .e. the burial was of the remains from a dual cremation, or may have accidentally been incorporated within this deposit during collection of bone from the pyre site for burial. If the pyre site was used for a succession of cremations and clearance of debris between events was inefficient, bone from an early cremation on the site not 114 EARLY ROMAN BURIAL IN DAR1FORD collected for burial may have accidentally been incorporated with bone fragments from a subsequent one. (NB. It is a characteristic of the rite of disposal of the dead by cremation that not all the bone remaining after cremation is incorporated in the burial, McKinley 1994a; 1997; 2000). It is, therefore, conceivable that the additional bone from Cremation Burial 2 (9a and 9) may pertain to the individual in Cremation Burial 1 (there is no duplication of fragments). The pathological lesions observed are largely indicative of joint disease, the older adult female (Cremation Burial 2) had osteoarthritis at two sites - cervical and thoracic vertebrae - and degenerative disc disease in a sacral vertebra. Osteophytes (new bone around joint surface margins) and exostoses (new bone at tendon and ligament insertions) generally show increased distribution with age, largely reflecting 'wear-and-tear', though there may be other predisposing factors (Rogers and Waldron 1987). The bone from context 6a and the majority of that from 9a and 9 was white in colour indicative of a high level of oxidation (Holden et al 1995 a and b). Some bone fragments from 9a and 9 were blue or grey - the right temporal region of the skull, right mandible and a few fragments of vault, fragments of arm bone from the elbow region, fragments of distal femur and a foot phalanx. Such a discrete distribution of poorly oxidised bone suggests specific causes; the right side of the head and one elbow may have been covered, for example by leather or fur, which would have impeded oxygen availability in those specific areas, and the distal femur may have been similarly affected. In a pyre cremation the lower leg and foot bones tend to burn earliest in the cremation process by virtue of their lack of surrounding soft tissues (McKinley 1994a); the poor oxidation of a single foot phalanx (four recovered) may indicate this one bone fell in amongst the fuel ash and was buried before it had fully oxidised. Since the remains of burial 6a were not fully recovered, and the bone from 9a and 9 may represent those of more than one individual, it would be inappropriate to discuss the weight of bone included in the burials other than to comment that the total weight of bone from grave I O represents a maximum of 80 per cent of the expected weight of bone from an adult cremation (McKinley 1993). The majority (>65 per cent) of the bone from both burials was recovered from the 10mm sieve fraction and the maximum fragment-size was 72mm from burial 9a and 56mm from burial 6a. Numerous factors may contribute towards the fragmentation of cremated bone, including the effects of soil infiltration and movement in excavation (McKinley 1994b), and there is no conclusive evidence for the bone being deliberately fragmented prior to burial. Bone from all skeletal areas was represented within the burial and there was no evidence to suggest deliberate selection of specific skeletal elements. Fragments of partridge-sized bird bone were recovered from all the deposits, 0.2g from Cremation Burial I, 2g from Cremation Burial 2 and 0.9g from deposit 9. The inclusion of animals as pyre goods is a common theme within the cremation rite, between I O and 50 per cent of burials from different Romano-British cemeteries containing cremated animal bone 115 PAUL HUTCHINGS (McKinley 2000; in prep.). Although domestic fowl was amongst the most popular species, non-domestic bird has been recovered elsewhere (Barber and Bowsher 2000). Fragments of melted glass - again, the remnants of pyre goods - were also recovered from Cremation Burial 2 and deposit 9. Slight charcoal flecking observed in context 6a and a fragment of burnt flint in context 9a are likely to represent the accidental inclusion a small amounts of pyre debris within the burials. Approximately 26 per cent of the cremated bone from Cremation Burial 2 was recovered from the backfill of the grave [context 9) rather than the burial. Since this deposit also contained fragments of pottery from the upper part of the vessel, it is possible that the bone represents spill from the urn. However, since the location of the bone within the fill is unknown, it cannot be conclusively excluded that it represented a deliberate secondary deposit outside the urn. The bone from the backfill represents the same individuals as that contained within the urns - with joins between at least two fragments - and a range of skeletal elements was present in both deposits. DISCUSSION by Paul Hutchings and Ian Riddler The presence of two cremation burials within the general area implies that a Roman cemetery survives in the vicinity of the site. Little can be said, at present, of the nature of that cemetery, although the burials recovered in this evaluation and watching brief are of early Roman date, and belong to the late first century and the first half of the second century. Alongside the cremation burials themselves, an area of burning was also located, at some distance (approximately 50m) to the east. This can possibly be identified as a pyre area, where the deceased were cremated. It may equally well, however, represent redeposited debris from a pyre area. A second deposit of possible pyre residue was located some 50m to the north-east. Such areas, or ustrina, are known from comparable sites in north-west Europe, although they have seldom been encountered or discussed in any detail. Their characteristics have, however, been summarised recently (Polfer 1996, 16-21 and 118-20; Barber and Bowsher 2000, 60-76). The debris seen at Dartford corresponds with descriptions of comparable deposits found elsewhere, as at Septfontaines-Deckt or London (Van Doorselar 1967, 106-7; Polfer 1996, 16-8; Barber and Bowsher 2000, 61). Ceramics from the deposits suggest that they were contemporary with the cremation burials. Cremation burials were recovered from Trench 2, but later disturbance had removed Roman deposits from Trenches 3 and 4. No cremation burials or Roman finds were discovered to the south of the pyre debris during the watching brief. The presence of pyre debris 116 EARLY ROMAN BURIAL IN DARTFORD might suggest that the site lay on the fringes of the cemetery, at its southern limit. It may extend further to the north, towards Spital Street. The infant burials discovered at Spital Street (Hicks 1995, 417, 421 and 427-8) are not necessarily a part of the same cemetery, given that infants were not always accorded the same burial rites as adults. However, they were found immediately to the north of this site, on the other side of Spital Street. The location of Dartford, at a crossing point of the River Darent on the main Roman road between London and Dover (Watling Street), made it a convenient centre for settlement and industry. There is reasonable archaeological evidence to support an argument for the presence of a Roman settlement, possibly a small town, in the area. A number of sites have yielded Roman remains including Spital Street, Lowfield Street and the High Street (Fig. 8). Spurrelt recorded an ········t······•·J􀀢x􀀣􀀤·G􀀥􀀦􀀧·􀀨····!······················ ··· .. 1· Fig. 8 Roman sites in Dartford. 0 0 . 5km ·f."' . \ ·y,􀀋􀀌 t􀀍 (The general alignment of Watling Street is shown; its precise course through central Dartford is not known. Cemetery sites are underlined.) 117 PAUL HUTCH1NGS area of plain, red tesserae at the corner of Lowfield Street and the High Street, and foundations of a Roman building further to the east, close to the church in High Street (Spurrell 1889, 3 I 2). Dale provided details of late Iron Age and Roman ceramics, predominantly of firstand second-century date, found close to the Roman building identified by Spurrell (Dale 1971). The Dartford Roman villa site was excavated by the Dartford District Archaeological Group in 1979. Alec Detsicas summarised the various discoveries in Dartford, and noted that 'though this evidence is sketchy and much of it awaits full publication, it nevertheless points to a settlement at or close to the crossing of the Darent, and it is not improbable that it developed near the spot where Watling Street crossed the river' (Detsicas 1983, 80). Roman cemeteries at Dartford are known at East Hill, and to the north at Joyce Green and Temple Hill (Payne 1897; Leyland 1990; Spurrell 1889, 312; Tester 1956). From the Beadle's excavations it now appears that another cemetery relating to this early Roman settlement lay to the west of the river and to the south of Watling Street. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The fieldwork was undertaken to a specification prepared by Kent County Council Heritage Conservation Group on behalf of Sainsbury' s Limited. Tbe author would like extend thanks to the managing agents for Sainsbury's (Gregory Dengate Limited) and the staff of Beadle's for their help and assistance. BIBLIOGRAPHY Barber, B. and Bowsher, D., 2000, The Eastern Cemetery of Roman London, MoLAS Monograph 4, London. Bass, W. M., 1987, Human Osteology, Missouri Archaeological Society. van Beek, G. C., 1983, Dental Morphology: an illustrated guide, Bristol: Wright PSG. Blockley, K., Blockley, M., Blockley, P., Frere, S. S. and Stow, S., 1995, Excavations in the Marlowe Car Park and Surrounding Areas, The Archaeology of Canterbury V, Whitstable. Buikstra, J.E. and Ubelaker, D. H., 1994, Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains, Arkansas Archaeological Survey Research Series 44. Dale, L. C., 1971, 'Belgic and Roman Pottery from Dartford', Archaeologia Cantiana, 86, 210-5. 118 EARLY ROMAN BURIAL IN DARTFORD Detsicas, A., 1983, The Cantiaci, Gloucester. van Doorselaer, A., 1967, Les necropoles d'epoque romaine en Gaule septentrionale, Diss, Arch. Gandenses, Bruges. Harrison, A. C., 1981, 'Rochester 1974-75', Archaeologia Cantiana, 91, 95-136. Hicks, A., 1995, Excavations at Spital Street, Dartford, 1991, Archaeologia Cantiana, 115, 413-30. Holden, J. L., Phakley, P. P. and Clement, J. G., 1995a, 'Scanning electron microscope observations of incinerated human femoral bone: a case study', Forensic Science International, 14, 17-28. Holden, J. L., Phakley, P. P. and Clement, J. G., 1995b, 'Scanning electron microscope observations of heat-treated human bone', Forensic Science International, 14, 29-45. Leyland, M., 1990, 'East Hill, Dartford', in Canterbury's Archaeology 1988-I989, Canterbury, 33-5. McKinley, J. I., 1993, 'Bone fragment size and weights of bone from modern British cremations and its implications for the interpretation of archaeological crematious', International J. Osteoarchaeology, 3, 283-7. McKinley, J. I., 1994a, 'The Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Spong Hill, North Elmham. Part VIII: The Cremations', East Anglian Archaeology, 69, Gressenhall. McKinley, J. I., 1994b, 'Bone fragment size in British cremation burials and its implications for pyre technology and ritual', J. Archaeol. Sci.,_21, 339-42. McKinley, J. I., 1997, 'The cremated human bone from burial and cremation-related contexts', in Fitzpatrick, A. P. (ed.), Archaeological Excavations on the Route of the A27 Westhampnett Bypass, West Sussex, 1992. Volume 2, Wessex Archaeology Report 12, Salisbury, 55-72. McKinley, J. I., 2000, 'The analysis of cremated bone', in Cox, M. and Mays. S. (eds), Human Osteology in Archaeology and Forensic Science, London (GMM), 403-21. McKinley, J. I., in prep., 'The wider temporal perspective of cremation in Roman Britain', from paper presented at Society of Antiquaries, November 2000, The study of Romano-British Funerary Practice: Dead or Alive? (conference proceeding to be published). McMinn, R. M. H. and Hutchings, R. T., 1985, A colour atlas of human anatomy, London: Wolfe Medical Publications. Millett, M., Pearce, J. and Struck, M., forthcoming, Putting Roman Burial Practice in Context. Monaghan, J., 1987, Upchurch and Thameside Roman Pottery - A Ceramic Typology for northern Kent, First to Third Centuries AD, British Archaeological Reports, British Series 173, Oxford. Payne, G., 1897, 'Researches and Discoveries in Kent', Archaeologia Cantiana, 22, Ii i. 119 PAUL HUTCHINGS Polfer, M., 1996, Das Galloromische Brandgrii.berfeld und der dazugehorige Verbrennungsplatz von Septfontaines-Deckt (Luxemburg), Dossiers d'A rcheologie du Musee National d'Histoire et d' Art V, Luxembourg. Riddler, I. D., forthcoming, 'The Roman Small Finds', in J. Rady, A. Hicks, I. Riddler and S. Pratt, Roads to the Past. Prehistoric, Roman, Anglo-Saxon and Medieval Sites at Monkton, Isle of Thanet, Canterbury Archaeological Trust Occasional Papers, Canterbury. Riddler, I. D., Lyne, M. and Mould, Q., forthcoming, The Roman Watermills at Ickham. Salvage Excavations of a Roman Industrial Complex by Jim Bradshaw and Chris Young, 1972-1975, Canterbury Archaeological Trust Occasional Papers, Canterbury. Rogers, J. and Waldron, T., 1995, Afield guide to Joint Disease in Archaeology, Chichester: Wiley. Spurrell, F. C. J., 1889, 'Dartford Antiquities', Archaeologia Cantiana, 18, 304-18. Tester, P. J ., 1956, 'First-century Pottery from Temple Hill, Dartford', Archaeologia Cantiana, 70, 253-4. Webb, P.A. 0. and Suchey, J. M., 1985, 'Epiphyseal union of the anterior iliac crest and medial clavicle in a modern multiracial sample of American males and females', Am. J. Phys. Anth., 68, 457-66. 120