
Dartford Antiquities (British, Roman and Saxon)
Contributions to the next volume are welcome. See the guidance for contributors and contact Editor Jason Mazzocchi. Also see the guidance for peer review.
Search page
Search within this page here, search the collection page or search the website.
St Paul's Cray Church
Crayford Church
( 304 )
DAETFOED ANTIQUITIES.
NOTES ON BEITISH EOMAN AND SAXON EEMAINS THEBE EOUND.
BY E. C. J. SPURRELL.
STONE IMPLEMENTS.
WHEN the Kent Archaeological Society met at Dartford, in 1868,
the knowledge and study of the more ancient stone implements was
in an early stage; almost in its infancy, being, so far as this country
was concerned, barely ten years old. And as those stone implements
were not commonly accepted as the work of man, they were looked
upon doubtfully by the old antiquary: and because one class of
them came out of deep cuttings in the ground, and from stalagmite
caverns, they were left to geologists as " fossils; " regarding that
word as dismissing the matter into the domain of geology. Yet,
for all that, the recognition of the earliest palaeolithic implements,
as human workmanship is due to Englishmen's acumen; and
although the study was revived in Erance, it was consolidated into
a science by the investigation of Englishmen once agaim In
our own district, that is, about ten miles round Dartford, quite as
much attention has been paid to the matter as in any spot in the
world, and with a greater success than anywhere else in determining
certain controverted points; such as the reality of human
agency in the formation of implements, and the larger grasp of the
subject consequent on the minute search which has traced them
continuously through a greater range in elevation and consequently
of age.
There are a few points to which I wish to draw attention.
Where Palaeolithic, Neolithic, or any implements whatever are
found in stratified deposits, the determination of their relative age
is comparatively easy. It is otherwise with those which lie on or
near the surface or in thin deposits of gravel. But there are
means of arriving at an approximation to the comparative age of
these, which it is the speciality of geologists to apply. The determination
of the true position of an implement lying in a river
gravel, which now constitutes the water-parting of two streams,
running in opposite directions, is a case in point; or the determination
of the relation of an implement found on the surface, to a
patch of gravel nearly denuded; or again the relation of implements
to any epoch of the glacial ages. I will not trouble you with
these details, but merely remark generally on the matter. Eirst
let me tell you that now, if the spots on which the older impleDARTEORD
ANTIQUITIES. 305
mentshave been found were marked on an ordinary map.of this
district, there would be no room for anything "else on it. Palaeolithic
implements have been found on the crest of our North*.
Downs, and as has been recorded in Archceologia Cantiana,
not merely scattered, but collected in special spots. If the
scattered ones may have been ice-borne, or dropped nearly in the
place on which they were found, those which like the collections
at Ash, Bower Lane, and Hayes, point to the agency of water,
whether temporary or intermittent, and in these cases there is some
relation traceable between the site of the collection and that of the
courses of our rivers ; though it may be far away from where their
diminished water course now runs.
As these implements, by wear, mineral condition, their comparative
elevation, form and make are traced step by step from
situations whose relative age is known, we arrive after due search
at their relative age. And there can be little doubt that the majority
of the implements found on our hills are the older as a higher level
. is reached. Of old and worn implements it is clear that we cannot
imagine or suppose they travelled up hill, so that if found on a hill
they are presumably older than those in a valley deposit near by,
and inasmuch as all the implementiferous gravels of our district are
the result of a severe denudation which reached its climax with the
deposit at the bottom of the modern Thames, the general rule of
height-age is safe, not but that implements, from high levels are
found in lower ones. And the denudation of 900 or 1000 feet of
our valley is respectable. Some of these implements can be
connected with the glacial ages. By the Glacial Period, as generally
understood, is meant that glaciers enveloped the country, reaching
a climax and declining. But the Glacial Age, or age of Glaciers, is
that of various invasions of this country by ice sheets, whether
from the north of England or from Norway at different times and
with great intervals. If an ice sheet ever covered the North Downs
it has left no signs behind. A glacier's sign is its moraine of
transported stones and clay. Such a moraine now exists on the
north edge of the Thames, seven or eight miles from here, and it
lies at the elevation of 200 feet above the sea, but never advanced
much further. Those river gravels which lie below that elevation
contain as an important part of their constitution material transported
from the North. Those gravels such as" the patches oh
Darenth and Swanscombe hills, which lie above that elevation,
contain no such northern drift, as it is called. Hence we are able
to say with respect to the particular glacial epoch I have mentioned
that the Darenth gravels and implements therein are pre-glaeial,
and that the implements from deposits 100 feet lower are either
intraglacial,* or post-glacial as those of Dartford Heath and Crayford
and Erith certainly are.
With respect to the separation between Palaeolithic and
Neolithic- implements, as the two divisions are called into which
* Interglaoial is the interval between two glaoial periods. Intraglacial is
during tlie glacial visitation,
VOL. XVIII, X
306 DARTEORD ANTIQUITIES.
stone implements are generally divided (the terms have also become
common to distinguish human remains and even deposits with
which they are associated, but eare must be taken to keep to the
terms Btrictly, and in no way to mix up the definition of a Palaeolithic
and Neolithic implement or deposit, with the presence or
absence of extinct mammalia), it is obvious that there must be an
approximation somewhere. If the question is unsettled as yet,
whether in this country or elsewhere, it is quite clear that the
matter has not been sufficiently investigated. So long as the desire
to separate is permitted to override the desire to unite and correct,
the matter will continue to he regarded according to the hobbled
custom of the old school of thought.
The Palaeolithic implements of our district are very marked in
their characters, but there may be seen examples of very rude and
very fine implements. Yet it is clear that, if the principles by which
I have argued, that there is a great range in their antiquity, be true,
this rudeness and sameness is extended over a period of time incomparably
greater than the stages of improved forms occupied in
the extension of the Neolithic period.
That there was no break between the< two ages I feel sure, and
it will be the duty of discontented and scientific enquirers to search
for the connecting link. Perhaps it will be found in the deep
gravel bed underlying the alluvium and water of the Thames
estuary, as I believe; for clearly, the river brought down gravel
continuously from Palaeolithic times, until having become an estuary
gravel ceased to accumulate and alluvium formed. Quite lately I
received a communication from Mr. Laurence that he had some
stone implements from the bed of the Thames whose history is
perfectly satisfactory. On examining these I found that two, obtained
from the Thames near Erith by dredging, had resemblances
which placed them if not midway, in such a position that they indicate
a passage type or form between Palaeolithic and Neolithic, Their
workmanship is good, they are uninjured, and their mineral condition,
marking, and colour is perfectly agreeable to the gravel in
which they were found. I am very well acquainted with the implements
of the lowest Thames gravel and the older gravels on its
margin, and can say that they resemble nothing as yet discovered
in either, but have a likeness to both, constituting a distinct type,
EAETHWOEKS.,
There are several earth-walled enclosures in the district. There
was one, it is now only just discoverable,, on Badgersmount, Darenth
Wood, it is a rough square with rounded corners, it was 200 feet in
diameter outside the wall at the ground level; with a ditch round it
about 10 feet across and 8 feet deep. Much stone chipping covers
the place. . , . _ , .
There is another on the hill top overlooking the Church of
Swanscombe, the diameter from the top of the mound is exactly
100 feet, quite circular with a ditch. At one part are banks and
ditches difficult to explain.
^M tt nU -r,wA«w>0
, -'1 Wont* (ottaparf: li N^ ^"""^ft- A Tl
E.m IT ~
feftwffcjtm
'-*—~
PM II
\ w
£Jfl HIMTO
/ / \^
g,,. ias -gy.,»
I v i
. JO* ^^-i».
-.!
• H*
R« <"'*"""-?
JW-
•W"
r
ke8t Ihurj-ock', j M H ^ 4
<^_ <#/«
Jtarvttj^*
&Z.
'Jt ' 1 K
> ^ » ^
•
,-stfJUi
L-*^J
'Cm J _
*«f ,<4" i t w*r«^sfcivW«,
HC^I^^ES^^iSUL^'
&•).
A i
T a p * *
!.f>:y J " ^
a t r ^
,--&/* jfrk ' 1
C r KCU. rfOTo-LiTMD.B.FUWIVAi. t * MDI.»0»K.C (
Ancient Sites in the Disuict cf Dartford,Kent.marked by F.C.J. Spurrell.
DARTFORD ANTIQUITIES. 307
There are some very extensive banks and excavations on the top
of the Telegraph Hill, Swanscombe, on either side of the old
Eoman way.
There is a camp on Mount's Wood, not, however, of great importance,
and the outline disturbed.
In Darenth Wood are banks and works on the south-east side.
Again on the south-west side, overlooking Lane End, they are of
considerable area,*
Hasted mentions banks at Greenstreet Green, and to the westward
of it. Both these I have formerly identified and marked on
the map, though now they are obliterated.
There is a faint outline of a camp (oval) 500 yards south-east of
Howbery. This is nearly obliterated.
There is a square camp with works, lying on the site of a previous
village in Jorden's Wood. It is probably Eoman, but this is
not quite clear. I cannot reconcile it, however, with any forms
known to be Saxon. Stone arrow-heads and Eoman pottery are
found in it.f
* This list will explain the numbers on the
G. Oeltio; T. Teutonic, Saxon, or Norse.
1 Urns, pottery. The Warren. R. 29
2 Tumulus. Shrewsbury House
Grounds.
3 Tumulus. Plumstead Common.
4 Leaden Coffin. East "Wickham. R.
5 Iron furnaoe and early hut holes.
map opposite, R.=Roman;
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24.
25
26
27
28
Bostol Heath.
Tumulus, partly examined.
Tumulus. Crematory.
•Wide. Lesnes Abbey.
Urns and Coin.
Coin.
Urns, etc. Blenden.
Pottery.
Leaden Coffin.
Deneholes.
Ornaments.
Foundations, etc.
Coins,miscellaneous objects
C.
T.
R.
R.
R.
R. and C.
R.
T.
R.
High
Road. "R, T., etc
Misc. R., T.
Ditto. R.
Ditto, R.
Pottery. Perry Street. R.
Pottery. R,
Coins. R, and C.
Tumulus.
Very ancient oamp.
Pottery in Denehole and on surface,
R,
Littlebrook Walls. T,
Burials. T.
Foundation burials, coins, misc.
objects on East Hill and Town
- - •- - R.
R.
T.P
R.
R.
t See Archceological Journal, vol. xxxviii,
of Dartford.
30 Coin. West Hill.
31 Tumuli.
32 Coins.
33 Foundations, miso.
34 Tumulus.
35 Tumulus not burial.
36 Square camp. 0.
Pottery. R.
34* Burials. T.
85* Foundation. R.
36* Graveyard. T.
37 Foundations. R.
38, 39 Camps or enclosures.
40 Small oamp on Badger's Mount,
4 1 ^w^lMentionedby
44 Pottery. R,
Tumuli, R.
Springhead finds. R.
Foundations. R,
Miso. pottery, etc R,
Circle camp.
Misc., etc
Foundations and remains in Denehole.
R,
Earthworks (Paul's Cray Common).
Miso. in Denehole. R,
Roman remains in the Marshland.
i plate 1, for a plan.
x2
42
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
R.
308 DARTFORD ANTIQUITIES.
There are ancient enclosures still visible on Paul's Cray-Common,
which have been figured in our volumes by Mr. Ehnders Petrie.*
The old roads of the country side can easily be inferred when
they are found to connect certain ancient sites, and when judged to
have existed previously to their having been crossed unconformably
and regardless of convenience by later ones of known date. There
are plenty of older ways than the Eoman street now called the
Dover Eoad. This road was called Watling Street by the Saxons.
A military way undoubtedly existed in Eoman times, and I think
before then.
The top of Swanscombe Hill was a most unfavourable spot for
a road; it is capped with greasy clay and is very steep. Heavybaggage
could have been carried over it with great difficulty, and in
winter it must often have been quite impracticable for an extensive
equipage. . I think it more than probable that this road was rarely
used, and that the branch leaving Dartford Brent by Greenhithe,
Northfleet, and Gravesend to Strood, superseded it during the
Eoman occupation.
No Eoman remains are found on Swanscombe Hill top, but hythe
more northerly or alternate road they are found.
The old road by the .Torden's Wood Camp is certainly pre-
Eom'an, although now discontinued even as a path in the wood.f..
There are few tumuli here. One on Shooter's Hill, one on
Bostol Heath, one in Abbey Wood, opened and found to be a crematory.
The How, which gave the name to Howbury; two in Baldwyn's
Park. One'I opened and found not to be a burial mound. •
' " Several tumuli once existed on Dartford Brent, and also in the
. woods overlooking Betsom. Near there I remember three close
together, and one is marked on the Ordnance map.
Iron smelting has left traces at Dartford Heath, Northfleet, and
at Abbey Wood,- and on Bostol Heath.
This last was a'very rude Bloomery, if such a term can be used
• to a Celtic work,, for* such I find to be its age. . This .was a small
work; much slag, however, covers the country for a couple of miles
• along the hill edge.
There are of course numerous earthworks on the country side
which do not call for special mention. Dams across valleys are not
uncommon, ancient banks which served the, purpose of dividing
land or edging enclosures. Most of these.are evidently, of historic
• date, and present no special points of interest. On Dartford Heath,
' however, there are numerous depressions and elevations which cali
' for a word; they may be classified thus, small depressions; round,
. shallow, and. rare. A few larger ones having the sameTproportipnate
width to depth as the smaller. . Square depressions and oblong
angular pits, these are mostly in rows, and placed as close as possible
together. There are also many tumuli. These vary very
.'much, but none are of large size, or exceed 4 ft. to 4 ft. 6 in height.
* Archceologia Cantiana, XIII., 8.
t See Archceological Journal, vol. xxxviii., plate i.
DARTFORD ANTIQUITIES. 309
When perfect they rise to a point so that there is no comfortable
standing room. A slight and narrow ditch about one foot deep
surrounds the mound—into which, projecting from the mound, are
numerous (but an uncertain number of) very small steps with
intervals between. These mounds are found" in ahgnments, of
which there are several. Yet in no case is there more than three
or four in a straight line; one row in a slightly serpentine course
extends over a large part of the Heath. The distances between the
mounds varies greatly, from one yard to fifty or sixty, their size
and height vary equally. If these in anyway represent military
arrangements, they are so far as regularity goes sadly deficient in the
proverbial quality proper to the art. That several mediaeval camps
occupied the Heath is on record, as well as the notable one in the
Prince Eegent's time. Hence some confusion of alignment would
be a necessity, but that hardly explains the want of symmetry I
have noticed. Some years ago I dug into these mounds at various
places, and found in every case that the gravel of the Heath had
been heaped on the sod and that no mystery beyond that which
appeared to the eye lay concealed. Similarly I examined numerous
depressions or hut circles, with, however, no result as to dating them.
Apparently, therefore,, all these works on Dartford Heath are
mediseval and military > the more ancient having been obliterated.
THE Tins WALLS OJ? THE THAMES.
There were no tide walls to the river when the Eomans first
came here. The whole of what is now below the level of high
water was then dry; at least, free from salt water. It was a thick:
woodland—marshy in places with streams running into a river now^
the estuary of the Thames; the river was fresh, or but very slightly
brackish, shallow, and very much narrower than the present stream
way. In the marsh now, under the layer of tidal clay which covers
what was forest ground, are very abundant remains of Eoman
occupation; these are occasionally found in excavations over the
whole marsh land. Occasionally relics of burial are discovered and'
in a few places the sites of dwellings. At Crossness, for instance,
the quantity of scattered pottery is surprising, and much of it was
of good quality.
I t is scarcely probable that even at the latest moment of the
Eoman stay any banks were needed, and it is certain that there are
no signs of any such early banks. There are no signs of banks
even of Saxon date, except those of Little Brook and Lesnes, and
these it is likely were to haul boats into, with walls only just sufficient
to ward off storm floods and keep off foes.
The effective embankments which we now see are very modern.
All embankments have been begun by small enclosures from the
shores; piecemeal, which have by degrees united until the outer
limit was reached and the walls as we have them were perfected.
It was no stupendous, mighty, or vast work begun, continued, and
ended at a single effort. They were hundreds of years in reaching
their present limits. The earliest recorded mining of any import310
DARTFORD ANTIQUITIES.
ance in this district is that of the marsh at Lesnes, and if the Canons
began immediately after their foundation, which is unlikely, they
had not done anything important until nearly one hundred years
after, viz., in 1279.
The writers who have previously considered this question have
been under a complete misapprehension as to the state of nature
when the Eomans hved here, beheving that no change in the level of
land and sea has happened since. Even Beale Poste, when treating
of changes in the coasts of England, has noticed that ancient Eoman
towns built on estuaries have since been buried by deposits from
the water; but he thinks that this is solely due to the raising of the
bed of the river, and consequently its water level by the deposits
brought down by the stream. In this he just misses the point I
wish to insist on, that, though this would be true as to a fresh
water stream, it is not true of an estuary, the height of the
deposits of which are regulated solely by the height reached by the
tide. If, therefore, we find land surfaces, as at Crossness and elsewhere,
now deeply buried under tidal deposits, there has been submergence
of the land by the sea in order that this might happen.*
a
t»» tt
10. vM
I I iflcjr.fi
•* Sh.
*ro ritt
311* & /
Ahhty
CP^
t- SAND ra
GiUVEl. VWuLt
JlMe.f4
S «
yo
(0
J c t v e r
to
Willi
M a r «!i U
San*
•vrti-h WORKS "TLRSNES KENT
* A fuller account of this part of the subject is given by me in Archceological
Journal, vol. xlii., p. 269, and in the Proceedings of the Geologists' Association,
vol. xl., p. 210. a
DARTFORD ANTIQUITIES. 311
There are works at Littlebrook extending into the tideway
before the modern river walls were erected. These I take to be
the Wick of some early Saxons, and to have been the celebrated
place mentioned in a deed of Ethelred A.D. 995. There was perhaps
a similar Teutonic Wick at the place afterwards occupied by Lesnes
Abbey.
\ \ * £<"T ff
/ooo SOO 2fe£»
« i Txiytmug
N ^ oi
•tm^'""' V i