( 225 )
THE TEXTUS ROEEENSIS IN CHANCERY
A.D. 1633.
BY A. A. ARNOLD, E.S.A.,
EX-CHAPTER CLEEK 01? EOCHESTEE CATHEDEAL.
IT is within the general knowledge of all who care for
Rochester, for its cathedral and its history, that the Textus
Roffensis, that "venerable monument of antiquity," as it
has well been called, has in its time encountered various
perils, by land as well as by water. It was once accidentally
submerged for some hours in the river Thames, aud on
another occasion was virtually stolen (' conveyed' the wise
call it) by a certain physician; Dr. Thomas Leonard of Canterbury,
who knew its great value. He detained it for at least
two years. The fact itself was notorious, as also that the
book was ultimately recovered by the Dean and Chapter and
restored to their library in Eochester Cathedral. No details
of the painful story have, however, so far as I know, been
hitherto published; and the recent discovery of some records
of the suit in Chancery, which the Dean and Chapter found
themselves forced to institute against the culprit, enables us
to throw some light on the circumstances.
The book must have been lent by the Dean and Chapter,
probably to a learned person who desired to make use of
some of its treasures; at any rate, it was in London in or
about the year 1630, and, as it happens that Sir Henry
Spelman is known to have had access to it about that time,
and had been making transcripts for his Glossary which he
had just published, and was also taking materials from it for
his Concilia^ ei Decreta Ecclesia Britannica which was published
a few years afterwards, it is not improbable that he
was the individual to whom the book had been lent,
voi,. xxx. Q
226 THE TEXTUS KOITENSIS
The abstract of the Bill in Chancery and of the Defendant's
Answer to it, the only record of the suit which at
present has come to hand, and for which we have to thank
Mr. P. M. E. Hqlworthy of Bromley, are printed in full
after these introductory notes. They shew that the Textus
being in London at the time mentioned above, that is about
the year 1630, it was desired to get it back to Eochester,
and that one Mr. Thomas Somer, described in the Bill of
Complaint (in which he was made to take the leading part of
plaintiff, or Orator) a,s one of the Clerks of Edward Eobinson,
Esquire, then one of the "Six Clerks" of the Court of
Chancery, being in possession of it, upon trust to deliver
it to the Dean and Chapter, understanding that one John
Larkin, clerk, one of the Prebendaries of Eochester Cathedral,
was within a short time to go to Eochester, he had
desired that gentleman to take charge of the book, which
the latter undertook to do, and had appointed Somer to
bring it to his lodgings in Fleet Street. Somer accordingly
did so, but the Prebendary being away at the time, he left
the book with the wife of the landlord of the lodgings, " a
haberdasher of hatts," or with his servant—he appears
afterwards to be doubtful which of them it was—and then
it seems certain that this Doctor Thomas Leonard, happening
to be lodging in the same house, found the precious
volume lying about, took it up, and either actually stole
it, or, which was much the same thing, gave the landlady,
or some one in the house, five shillings, or some such sum,
and then carried it off.
Nothing is known of Mr. Thomas Somer, but I think
we may assume that he had been employed by Sir Henry
Spelman, or by whoever had the care of the book at
the time, to copy from it. He was a clerk in the office of
the Six Clerks, who were high functionaries of the Court
of Chancery, discharging duties simUar, I think, to those
afterwards performed by the Masters of the Court, and, at
the present day, by the Eegistrars; no doubt but that being
in such an occupation he was an expert in caligraphy,
accustomed to copy ancient documents, and just the right
IK" CHANCERY A.D. 1633. 22V
person to be employed to make the required transcripts from
the Textus; anyhow, it would seem that he was engaged
in some such way with this book, and so it was in bis
lawful possession at the time, and on that ground, I suppose,
he was made the plaintiff, as it was he, and not the Dean and
Chapter, who had entrusted the book to the landlady of the
lodgings, and had made the arrangement for its delivery by
her husband to the Prebendary of the Cathedral, who was to
take it to Eochester. In the Bill this gentleman is called
John' Larkin, but his true name was Lorkin. He was a
Prebendary of Eochester Cathedral from 1625 to 1654, when
he died. He was also at this time Vicar of St. Nicholas,
Eochester.*
I t is observable that Somer in his BiU of Complaint,
which bears date the 18th November 1633, avers that the
transaction took place about
Previous
Previous
The Oldest Map of Romney Marsh
Next
Next