( 255 )
CAMPEGGIO'S PROGRESS THROUGH KENT
IN 1518
V. J. B. TORR.
INTRODUCTION.
CARDINAL Campeggio is weU known as Wolsey's coUeague
in the hearing of the famous divorce suit between
Henry VIII and Katherine of Aragon, tried at Blackfriars
in London, in 1529. But fewer people are aware that some
eleven years earUer Campeggio performed another legatine
commission in this country, a visit which, although fruitless
in its immediate objects, had nevertheless an incidental
result of the most important character.
The foUowing pages give the reader a graphic account
of Campeggio's landing in England on the former occasion,
and of his stately progress through Kent to London. The
original is to be found among the Harleian MSS. in the
British Museum, and is written in an early sixteenth century
hand, which makes it probable that the proceedings were
recorded shortly after their occurrence. I am not aware
that this MS. has been previously printed. Many readers
wiU probably be reminded of the accounts of Wolsey's own
progresses, as given by his biographers, Cavendish and Fiddes.
A few words upon the career of Campeggio may not be out
of place in this introduction.
Lorenzo Campeggio was born in 1472, of a noble famUy
settled in Bologna, at which university, and at Pavia, we
find him studying Imperial law some twenty years later.
EventuaUy he married and had a son who, foUowing his
father, attained the cardinalate at the creation of Pope Juhus
I I I in 1551. The lawyer Lorenzo, having suffered the loss
of his wife, decided to embrace a second profession, in which
legal attainments were at that period one of the surest means
of promotion. Accordingly, he took Holy Orders, and soon
256 CAMPEGGIO's PROGRESS THROUGH KENT.
came under the notice of Pope Leo X, by whom he was
appointed Bishop of Feltri and also Auditor of the Rota in
Rome. Leo employed him on a diplomatic mission to the
Emperor Maximilian I, and conferred a cardinal's hat upon
him during his absence. In the following year, 1518,
Campeggio was despatched on the legatine journey to Henry
VIII which forms the subject of this paper. Not only was
he honourably received, but Henry bore him such good wiU
that he afterwards gave him the see of Salisbury, in 1524.
I t is uncertain whether the King nominated him
spontaneously, or merely acquiesced in the continuance of
the same evil system of non-resident episcopal commendams
given to ahens, which Worcester suffered for nearly forty
years, and which had affected Hereford and Bath and WeUs
also at this period. Not only were the Itahan agents in Rome
of Henry VII and VIII rewarded by an illegal conference of
the revenues of Enghsh sees upon them (thus the future Pope
Clement VII held Worcester for a year); but the notorious
episcopal pluralism of Wolsey himself served to perpetuate
one of the greatest abuses in ecclesiastical affairs, in the case
of a man who showed a desire in many respects for reformation.
However Campeggio's case may have been, it mattered Uttle,
as by the early 16th century in England, as also in France
and Spain, episcopal appointments lay in reahty with the
Crown,1 and the system of Papal " provisions " had become,
like the claim to confer the temporalities of a see, a technical
formahty which preserved the dignity of the Apostohc See
while the temporal prince remained the master of the situation.
Campeggio's English preferment was but a beginning,
as soon afterwards he occupied the archbishopric of Bologna
1 In England, at any rate, this held good from a considerably earlier
date. It is an important point, proved by numerous instances, as for
example, the appointment to Worcester in 1434, and still more notably
to York in 1425, where that resolute reviver of Papal power after the Great
Schism, Martin V, suffered signal humiliation in his attempt to override the
Privy Counoil of Henry VI. Since writing the above, I find that Lingard,
who treats of the subject at length under the reigns of Edward III and
Richard II, sums up in the case of the latter by saying that the Popes
henceforth "provided " none but the Royal nominees, and that "this long
and angry controversy ended entirely to the advantage of the Crown."
(Hist. Eng. iii, 173.)
CAMPEGGIO'S PROGRESS THROUGH KENT. 257
and other bishoprics in Italy, agreeably to the pubhc opinion
of the day, which had not unduly recoUed at the thirteen sees
held by Julius II—many of them in plurality—before he
became Pope.
Campeggio's talents were again employed in Germany,
now in the Lutheran ferment, in 1524, and three years later
he found himself besieged with his master Clement VII, by
the Imperial troops, in the castle of Sant' Angelo overlooking
the Tiber.
Shortly afterwards followed the great mission to England
over the divorce, in which aU parties had so many interests,
involving a tedious delay of years, that it is creditable to
Campeggio that he acquitted himself so fairly. As is well
known, upon Katherine's appeal the case was recaUed to
Rome, whither the cardinal returned, not without an affront
from the customs officers at Dover which was probably
inspired by the irritation of Henry at the further check
received.
At the abohtion of the Papal jurisdiction in England,
in 1534, Campeggio was deprived of Salisbury by Act of
Parliament, as an alien and non-resident, although he had
never been required to perform his duties in person. He died
in Rome in 1539, a man of good reputation, who, if ecUpsed
by Wolsey's brilhant talents, had during his life at least
what FuUer caUs ingenium par negotio.
To come now to Campeggio's visit to this country in
1518; Leo X sent him with two objects, both of which he
failed to negotiate successfuUy. The first was to secure the
adherence of Henry VIII to a general alliance of Christian
princes against the Turkish menace in eastern Europe ; the
second, to impose a Papal tax of a tenth on aU the clerical
revenues in England, towards the cost of the projected
crusade. Mutual jealousy and mistrust among the monarchs,
coupled with their greater preoccupation with other concerns,
rendered the alliance project abortive; and the clergy
proved intractable about the tax* In the first place, no such
tax could be levied without Royal hcence, and this under
severe penalties, as had appeared in the sharp reprimand of
21
258 CAMPEGGIO'S PROGRESS THROUGH KENT.
Richard II to Archbishop Courtenay in 1389 -,1 and in the
second, men had learned from the precedents of later
mediseval crusading projects that the funds coUected generaUy
went no further than the Papal treasury: hinc caute agendum.
The reply of the Enghsh Convocations was that they
were already drained by the exactions of the Crown, for the
war with France, taxes approved by Julius I I ; and that the
decree of Constance had forbidden Papal taxation of the
Church save in urgent necessity, and even then it must be
by authority of a general Council.2 The palmy days of
Henry III were gone; in England the growth of the power
of the Crown, and the frequently enacted legislation against
Papal encroachments, which, even if spasmodicaUy put into
effect, was always a trump card in reserve, had combined to
stem the flow of revenue abroad, except when the King was
agreeable, and this was generaUy (as with Henry VII) when
he could get a share for himself; and a simUar growth of
strongly entrenched national states on the Continent
(especiaUy France and Spain3) during the preceding century
had curbed the Papal power there also. The foreign clergy
accordingly made but a meagre response to the similar
financial demands now made upon them.
Campeggio had also been empowered to conduct, in
company with Wolsey, a legatine visitation of the exempt
Enghsh monasteries, but the latter wanted to undertake this
work single-handed, and was planning, by concentrating both
Royal and Papal power in his own hands to make himseh
master of the Enghsh Church. His boundless ambition—
not stopping short of the Papacy itseh—was acceptable to
Henry VIII, who saw the way to obtain, by the co-operation
of himself and his favourite, an even greater control of the
Church than had been enjoyed by his father. The king
therefore lent aU his support to the cardinal's schemes,
whereby the latter was quickly enabled to supersede the
normal workings of ecclesiastical jurisdiction, and to place
1 Wilkins, Concilia, III, 207.
2 Collier, Hec. Hist. (ed. Lathbury), IV, 24.
3 Of. the firm hand taken in Church affairs by Louis XI and Ferdinand
and Isabella, in their respective dominions.
CAMPEGGIO'S PROGRESS THROUGH KENT. 259
the unfortunate primate, Warham of Canterbury, in subordination
to himself,1 becoming virtuaUy a Thomas CromweU
many years before the rupture with Rome.
Wolsey had accordingly no difficulty in getting Henry's
aid to defeat Campeggio's monastic visitation, and he used
the weapon of delay. The English kings, hke those of
France, had always insisted upon their right to exclude a
Papal legate from their dominions unless he had obtained
their consent to enter,2 and this veto was brought to bear
upon Campeggio in 1518, while Wolsey was gaining time.
Campeggio was therefore detained at Calais until Dr. Clark,
the envoy representing Henry and Wolsey, could get to Rome
and back again, having demanded the appointment of
Wolsey as an equal legatus a latere with Campeggio, a request
which Leo X conceded.
This was the important sequel to Campeggio's mission
which remained after the Itahan's temporary and fruitless
legatine commission was completed, that of Wolsey being,
however, permanent and the means that made him absolute
over the Enghsh clergy. This was the great crime, his
acceptance of the commission, which with typical Tudor
duphcity Henry—all along acquiescent if not actuaUy its
instigator—urged against the cardinal in later years, to cause
his faU. Wolsey feU, struck down by the force of the
Praemunire legislation treacherously invoked by the king,
and with him, a Uttle afterwards, was involved the entire
body of the Enghsh clergy who had had, wiUy niUy, to obey
the very authority which now they were in peril for having
1 There had been precedents for this : in the twelfth century, Henry
of Blois, Bishop of Winchester, had, as legate, overshadowed Archbishop
Theobald; and in the fifteenth, the rights of Canterbury were again set
aside when Chichele was fettered by Cardinals Beaufort and Kempe.
Chichele was a good canonist who saw the evils of such innovations on the
ancient economy, and while Henry V lived the insult was forbidden. The
archbishop's remarkable letter of protest to the king in 1418 should be read,
in its original English, in Duck's Life of Chichele (ed. 1699), pp. 126-31 :
as the result, Beaufort's permanent legateship was postponed for some
years.
2 This was the Royal claim, jealously maintained ; but a Pontiff such
as Boniface VIII, who regarded himself as master of the world even in
temporal matters, must inevitably be constantly chafing against i t : hence
the close watch set on foreign legates while in England, despite the honours
shown to them as their due.
260 CAMPEGGIO'S PROGRESS THROUGH KENT.
accepted. As is well known, Henry cleverly used this
opportunity, not only for the extortion of an enormous fine
from the whole clergy, but also as a powerful weapon to make
himself their absolute master. For this reason, then, the
episode of this Uttle noticed embassy of Campeggio was
destined to become a landmark in Enghsh Church history.
As to the actual record of Campeggio's journey through
Kent, Uttle need be said by way of introduction, since it teUs
its own story quite plainly. It may however be noted that
the direct route to London was not taken, on account of the
detour to Boxley Abbey and Warham's fine new manor house
at Otford. Moreover, the cardinal took the unusual course
of landing, like Csesar, at Deal, and not, as usuaUy, at Dover.
Deal was about this period growing in importance, owing to
the ever increasing silting up of Sandwich Haven, but the
buUding of any considerable town near the shore appears to
have been deferred until the foUowing century.1
I t is of interest further to remember that Campeggio's
reception at Canterbury took place at the then newlyfinished
Christ Church Gate, the inscription formerly visible
upon it stating that it was completed in the year 1517.
Any references to the shrine of St. Thomas are always worthy
of note, and we have it here recorded that the legate paid two
visits to it.2 It cannot be doubted that by this time the once
enormously popular cult of the saint had much diminished,3
which may explain the remarkable absence of commotion
in Canterbury when the shrine was later in Henry VIII's
reign removed by his order. The visit of Campeggio was
about six years after that of Colet and Erasmus, so vividly
1 Leland speaks of Deal as still a " fisscher village " half a mile from
the sea—an under-estimate. The blocking of Sandwich Haven was later
aggravated by the grounding of a ship of Pope Paul IV (1555-9), which
became a wreck incapable of removal.
2 It is stated that he was shown certain other of the great and strange
store of relics which mediaeval Christ Church possessed. The almost
exclusive interest to even the educated visitor to great churches in the
Middle Ages lay in their relics, so often the object of Erasmus's satire.
Leland is among the first to take any notice of monuments, other than
saints' tombs; and long afterwards observers begin to appreciate, at
first uncritically, the glories of the architecture about them. Eor an
early (1446) visit to Christ Church, see Stanley, Memorials, 266-8.
3 See inter alia, Stanley, op. cit. 253, and Arch. Oant. XXXVI I I , 169-60.
CAMPEGGIO'S PROGRESS THROUGH KENT. 261
pictured by the latter in his Peregrinatio religionis ergo, and
two years before that of Henry VIII and the Emperor
Charles V. Campeggio's lodging at St. Augustine's, and his
attendance at High Mass in the now destroyed abbey church
and at the great dinner on his Sunday in the metropolitical
city are also worthy of remark.
The manner of the legate's reception at Blackheath and
in London will be read with interest, and is strikingly similar
to the account of the bringing of the red hat by an Apostohc
Protonotary to Wolsey, in November, 1515, to be found in
Fiddes' Life of Wolsey (London, 1726, 2nd ed., CoUections,
pp. 201-2). It wiU be noted how early pubhc functions began
in Tudor England: Campeggio has arrived in Canterbury
from Sandwich before ten o'clock; and the memorable
consecration of Parker on the December morning of 1559
begins in Lambeth Chapel long before daybreak. So, too,
at the solemn investiture of Wolsey as cardinal in Westminster
Abbey, we read that Archbishop Warham began to
sing the Mass of the Holy Ghost by nine o'clock ; and early
in 1528, at the thanksgiving in St. Paul's for the escape of
Clement VII from the sack of Rome by the Imperial army,
Wolsey had arrived in state and had gone in procession in
the church before about the same time : " And duringe that
the howre was a singing he was revestyd in pontificahbus,"1
to attend the High Mass celebrated by my Lord of London
before him. The " howre" means the singing of Terce,
canonicaUy appointed for about nine in the morning, at the
third hour of the day.
I t only remains to add that the MS. has been faithfuUy
reproduced in this transcript, with the exception that modern
punctuation has been inserted. That of the original is so
confusing and inconsistent in its employment, that, notice
being here given, it has seemed a pardonable liberty to rescue
the modern reader from it. The letter " w " is so difficult
in places, to assign certainly as a capital or uncial, that modern
usage has been foUowed in cases of doubt ; and marks over the
text have been omitted, unless serving to show contractions.
1 Eiddes, op. cit., Coll., p. 144.
262 CAMPEGGIO'S PROGRESS THROUGH KENT.
HARLEIAN MS. 433.
(July, 1518.)
fol. 293.
The Receyuyng of the popes legate in to England
Anno xmo RR h vhj ul .
(23rd) Md, that the Friday, the xxiij u daie of the moneth
of Iuly, The yere of or lord god MiCCCCCxviij, and the xt h yere
of the Reigne of or souuraine lord king henry the vhj t n , that nowe
Reigneth, The popes legate, caUid dns laurencius de Campegio,
arrived at a place callid the Deele, besids Sandewich, where the
Bisshop of Chichestr',1 The lord of Burgevennye and the lord
Cobham, w* a grete nombre of Estates and gentilmen of Kent,
receyued hym, and soo frome thense conveyed hym to Sandewich
aforesaid, where he restid that nyght.
(24th) The Saturday next, the said Bisshop, lordes, Estates,
& gentilmen conveied hym frome thense to Canterbery, where
he was betwene ix and x of the clokke before noone, and afore
his ente there chaunging his apparaiU, was Receyued by aU the
clergie and reUgious men there, And alsoo by the maior of that
Citie w* the Aldermen, and soo brought to the gats of Crists
Churche, where Tharchebisshop of Canterbery,2 The Bisshop of
Rochest',3 wfc Thabbotts of Saint Augustines4 and Faur sham,B
The priours of Crists Churche6 and of Saint Gregories,7 being aU
in pontificahbs, receyued hym solempnehe. And aftir he hadde
kissed the hooly Crucifix he was brought vp to the high Awter,
The Monkes singing Sume Vinitati
Previous
Previous
The Apse in Kentish Church Architecture
Next
Next