
A fragmentary Life of St. Mildred and other Kentish Royal Saints
Contributions to the next volume are welcome. See the guidance for contributors and contact Editor Jason Mazzocchi. Also see the guidance for peer review.
Search page
Search within this page here, search the collection page or search the website.
Annual Report
Further Consideration of the Bowman's Lodge Industry
A FRAGMENTARY LIFE OF ST. :MILDRED
AND OTHER KENTISH ROYAL SAINTS
By M. J. SW.ANTON, B.A., Pn.D., F.S.A., F.R.HIST.S.
ALTHOUGH long known to philolog.ists,1 the fragments which constitute
the so-called Lives of the Kentisk Royal Saints are worth drawing to
wider attention. For while little of the information it offers is unavailable
elsewhere, the form in which it is presented probably represents
the genuine Canterbury tradition in a relatively pristine state, reflecting
a lively interest at the very end of the Anglo-Saxon period in the Golden
Age of Kent and especially its native hagiography. Although in part, at
least, in the form we have it, fashioned into a homily for the festival of
St. Mildred, the framework of the piece is that of a straightforward
memorial of all the Kentish royal saints, parallel with and in places
verbally identical with the odd compilation we call The Resting Places
of the Saints. 2
The royal patronage of monasticism in what was acknowledged to be
the cradle of English Christianity must have been of particular interest
to the age of the Benedictine Revival. But perhaps the greatest attraction
of this piece always lay in its account of the dramatic circumstances
which led up to the endowment of Minster-in-Thanet. The story was
repeated frequently by twelfth-century Latin historians.a But it must
have been of particular interest in those places that could boast relics
of the saints involved,4 and not unnaturally received greatest attention
from scholars at Canterbury. Of these, perhaps the most significant was
Goscelin, a Flemish monk from St. Bertins who had come to England
in the train of Bishop Herman shortly before the Conquest. He was no
doubt introduced to the subject during brief sojourns at Ely and at
Ramsey, both of which claimed relics of certain of these royal saints;&
1 Cf. T. 0. Cooka.yne, Leechdoms, W ortcunnmg and Starcraft of EarlAJ England,
London, 1864-6, iii, 401; F. Liebermann, Die Heiligen Englands, Ha.nnover, 1889,
Pallsim; M. Forster, 'Die altenglisohen Beigaben des Lambeth-Psalters', Arohiv fur
d